Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 27 July 2016 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0778112D197 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=V7a2tBo7; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=vV4+KR7U
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxiQSsyooZEi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFE512D0A6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.35.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6R7EJYr001036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1469603672; x=1469690072; bh=WGlWo+9CW8ZSRriT0Xspzk9B+CkeqckwkB3Cv6BXpyo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=V7a2tBo76Iq/ufrkk3eJQM0xSO1kIx7cfX8lZAjhP97ha/6XIawAss4KwnKhBM+zC W7+ktMJMSIJeu6t2wlRC4et7A3K5/QHR1tPi2rCJqq8CuC505h2P1qiVsGG4uVA/OZ tZqZi2S1b1942MYSq/+XBwkFxzQnFRe3QMqP38N8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1469603672; x=1469690072; i=@elandsys.com; bh=WGlWo+9CW8ZSRriT0Xspzk9B+CkeqckwkB3Cv6BXpyo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=vV4+KR7Um95IlXQLNVDYoq/Wh6XbE7dcGBuiCyD4p9ffoJ5rVcpCr9Ra5AEzkToLb u7ArmWBzrwz8fAnoEVvZa2Em3YUrHe2UvUKiswFXh+8l7L7B/yyF2oEPJ+Dj3G3UKt FLTo/NMyS4p3EuKD7dshhGgyJzIHSLVFBN0FvgtQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160726230853.0ab08708@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:12:49 -0700
To: mrex@sap.com, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
In-Reply-To: <20160726105626.881741A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
References: <CAF4+nEHWP3k+2ikrpByVoEXwf0Rp7BuLAqTnk7n+aKxEQX3ZGg@mail.gmail.com> <20160726105626.881741A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Ss89xm05obqG1TFSjXpQruvA6B0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:14:34 -0000

Hi Martin,
At 03:56 26-07-2016, Martin Rex wrote:
>The issue isn't about recording, but about publication.
>
>And you really need _consent_, any rip-off/coercion in the US contractual
>style (package deal) will not work here, because such contract clauses
>will be legally void in Germany, similar to most of the contents of
>click-through-licenses in software.
>
>The issue is much less about folks on stage, but folks in the room
>-- an that is what the original question was about.

The original question was about about whether it is okay to publish 
pictures of a person for just being on the premises.  The short 
answer is that the photographer could ask the person whether he/she 
is okay with having his/her photo taken.

The Note Well is about activities such as working group sessions or a 
plenary [1].  The question here would be about whether it is 
appropriate for the organization to publish audio/video recordings of 
those activities.  That would be covered by a privacy policy.  There 
isn't a simple answer as each country has its own laws.  The 
discussion about what is public highlights the differences.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. There have been discussions about other events in respect to Contributions.