IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sun, 17 July 2016 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAD712B02E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RaMMK6aofVw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EFFA12B05E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j185so214672433oih.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c0fOYZPaxz0zAMuvq0FuNIjAyekdvpRRX4AxmXq1YIg=; b=VANWbjrIaax30lMaVidel0k8eYRSgUpWFVk+CUZG9NAyT6tG6ySwneaBNvuYDbIeKQ URazeU3L9ZN4KP0ZnsYgjOlqLbhEY+/r+yLl8dISGEyw4+kIy+ok793+hC+jv/fpuNFG 8sHraY8/Vxb9wRCvlXEPgNFIXQSHZ0w3WIuaXArUThTgc6XOI8rpgjaBcXkquIo16PgN g8SzJIA746WlaDQvofYXHklnZSmKrb3sJLOoJFQZAPEv6JsRRs0YJv3qeY1pBCtUjizF pw7vBPCP4dwRCYWMuy6Js1+ZecWnC+HedteeNdmmOXRTn3/uLQsIsf1vNw9jb+8FkrRz qtZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c0fOYZPaxz0zAMuvq0FuNIjAyekdvpRRX4AxmXq1YIg=; b=Fp8gcn403r7KOa79kvQ6xhJhBzaUpsnvVubW+Mu0yzuE8PYhkOChp2/SWD+waIc7cE fAU2StJWEk/KRSor/ZEQ4ONKN4aAoyCOrGtEG/4Mw2iASPlDW/8hO/2IObWmqJE+1Qr6 MgJCfX+cRzE6kI074tU8biQOZLfaKJKFTCZsOg8sKoZ/zq1sVDFiz4grLoXhgTbYHtc+ cTYPUWH6BqcZioUD5D2iEcLuevSbE8x33Lek7/eghr9U0FWjNUPd/uRFDdBjsJqv+8vJ uThaVUcD10gHqrmz/I80NtAlX4rn2W3AfEa2aJxzP2J83y5GlsTVWWTtnN5Jo4omdvIQ p9tA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tImlfD+g2nM7Xo5sSPHOhKMT/C88hPJyrQFk9FXmfTY9z0/sEvgrqEfo8HqoP46c63OgcfQHOS2MXZxsw==
X-Received: by 10.157.21.112 with SMTP id z45mr13437044otz.61.1468760471470; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.63.77 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607171150370.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607171150370.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:00:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0SDZBuEiZxMacMLOmDfchVcKqu4m1wRLEPucmZ5qnyuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c19018c2987380537d4726c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EmQ0E3JhbkYHozRqmconragZTC0>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 13:01:14 -0000

IMHO (but then I’m not a lawyer, and esp. a German lawyer with regards to
this meeting), hotel function rooms are public places, and you’re in as
much danger of having your photo taken and published as you are in any
other public place, such as on the street. How can newspapers publish crowd
shots if they need permission of everyone in the photo?

Cheers,
Andy


On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> in the Hackathon there are a lot of pictures taken. A statement was made
> that if you didn't want pictures of yourself published, please talk to the
> organizers.
>
> We have an IETF Note Well: https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well.html
>
> It doesn't mention pictures, and it doesn't mention just being in the
> room, is that is a "statement" or "communication" according to the note
> well. It also doesn't list the Hackathon as a function (it's not a WG or
> BoF, right?)
>
> So does the Note Well as written today mean that it's ok to publish
> pictures of you for just being on the premesis? I think it should be, but
> do we then need to augment the Note Well?
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email