IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 27 July 2016 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B93A12D728 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=OGDZ+m+8; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=lxK2D/g/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1y3Doc-kN5V2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235AB12D73B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.51.199]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6RHWUOL022563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1469640762; x=1469727162; bh=0ZSOiUqC0dxZe+urZIBEAmcNh2j/F4ij2f6B0SwwsjE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=OGDZ+m+8gR3lgJ/HC6cti10QNag29Olkpqd6y9fQGVBZzqoUVKgwnswfTQ4jOlPCT j5+bv3CGj9slYZ1hQTPdW3ippZ14u0Vl3aLKiMXEZLHseYK55Q1MbOibgcuN0fyr8O dwwLQlD6ZOQbQ7jRNvOviVJMtOsTGzrx7vrJPaCo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1469640762; x=1469727162; i=@elandsys.com; bh=0ZSOiUqC0dxZe+urZIBEAmcNh2j/F4ij2f6B0SwwsjE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=lxK2D/g/TXV80rjMGZ9vTX2tTiFPwSItyHZAHvT+qZDk23jh5WosmKlCcaYcfwpS/ kmBUliCwqn3lWwTTDTodauRAloTUuzNYEtrOCpEVu1kVrdZBMq94SX4sdvDQACRi4M VFu4kfmFJDF4bSxqRoBStmS6nMIzlckhnkUCXQgU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160727084251.0cb3cc58@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:33:18 -0700
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2kV07aWk9CvnP4QA=8nynNS+bb23nCxNgJa3ut-be+eg@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEHWP3k+2ikrpByVoEXwf0Rp7BuLAqTnk7n+aKxEQX3ZGg@mail.gmail.com> <20160726105626.881741A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <6.2.5.6.2.20160726230853.0ab08708@resistor.net> <CAA=duU2kV07aWk9CvnP4QA=8nynNS+bb23nCxNgJa3ut-be+eg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TFqrLD64hGRN1EF_9jPQ3O_F3Ic>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:32:54 -0000

Hi Andy,
At 05:23 27-07-2016, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>Here's a concrete example. Photos of IETF plenaries have been 
>published, online or otherwise, in various formats and venues, such 
>as on Facebook or on blogs. Sometimes I've spotted myself in the 
>photos, in at least one case very visibly. However, it is impratical 
>to check with every single person attending the plenary to ask their 
>permission ot publish the photos. Should they be allowed to be 
>published? I think so, even though I wasn't asked at the time.

The Note Well would not cover the above example as the venues do not 
look like venues where the organization conducts its work.  There are 
country-specific laws which regulate the publication of an image of a person.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email