IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 27 July 2016 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A69C12D56F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ETimAhHszP2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73F012D14D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1bSQ3h-0002jF-S7; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:43:42 +0000
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:43:40 +0900
Message-ID: <m2r3af2lb7.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2kV07aWk9CvnP4QA=8nynNS+bb23nCxNgJa3ut-be+eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEHWP3k+2ikrpByVoEXwf0Rp7BuLAqTnk7n+aKxEQX3ZGg@mail.gmail.com> <20160726105626.881741A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <6.2.5.6.2.20160726230853.0ab08708@resistor.net> <CAA=duU2kV07aWk9CvnP4QA=8nynNS+bb23nCxNgJa3ut-be+eg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4TRdCoCkrzC086Qui-MiTXEK8sQ>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:43:45 -0000

> Here’s a concrete example. Photos of IETF plenaries have been published,
> online or otherwise, in various formats and venues, such as on Facebook or
> on blogs. Sometimes I’ve spotted myself in the photos, in at least one case
> very visibly. However, it is impratical to check with every single person
> attending the plenary to ask their permission ot publish the photos. Should
> they be allowed to be published? I think so, even though I wasn’t asked at
> the time.

i have no useful opinion if they should or not.

the point was that, by german law, if taken in the last ietf, that would
be illegal.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email