IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex) Mon, 25 July 2016 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9043812D93E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ACZafdXQottA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C2CB12D93C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail06.wdf.sap.corp (mail06.sap.corp [194.39.131.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ryp451LLGz1Hnh; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:23:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-purgate-ID: 152705::1469467381-00007F13-0735726F/0/0
X-purgate-size: 749
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate-type: clean
X-SAP-SPAM-Status: clean
Received: from ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (ld9781.wdf.sap.corp [10.21.82.193]) by mail06.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ryp444v4mzkyqd; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:23:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix, from userid 10159) id A10911A508; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:23:00 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU0SDZBuEiZxMacMLOmDfchVcKqu4m1wRLEPucmZ5qnyuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:23:00 +0200
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20160725172300.A10911A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: mrex@sap.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MM-zVwkB6gV4Xx0AvHhxbKhnhU4>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:23:04 -0000

Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> IMHO (but then I?m not a lawyer, and esp. a German lawyer with regards to
> this meeting),

Obviously not.

>
> hotel function rooms are public places,

Nope, hotel rooms are *no* public places.

>
> and you?re in as much danger of having your photo taken and
> published as you are in any other public place, such as on the street.
> How can newspapers publish crowd shots if they need permission
> of everyone in the photo?

The problem isn't the taking of photos, but the publication
of photoes without permission of the folks on the photos.
Whenever folks on the photoes become easily identifiable,
a permission might be required before publication.

http://www.out-law.com/page-4663


-Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email