IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 27 July 2016 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD2112D8F9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HP7erWX6eMIy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x235.google.com (mail-pf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2538A12D8E7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id h186so13827961pfg.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MPdyZdXtLpy4ISH0JWi2t8HIOh1PC+bhXFK+4SBXlQo=; b=AE5eqd2+yp4LZVdWjfol7PcZINAbTXWee2TChhQw/DTfAupQ4HM9u0Fef5+JtOy2VM Zrk4G401MqndyCKkAiZ/1M92c6/291AWzbJUaY8kep6hPGsYAfKvvokb13R2UYtgWvEe QQkpqaY+AqoK23KTUtAcYxcGlphxnvq3U4m3EnDtXwT0HkM1V6wPoTlFbBOESFGwFGFR GnItghnVc5iXnddA+mTjNu62FX0vunuU+ICNc4kuxyAXHSgeDj/LD5UI3pnv0T1DRybo Ysdw1ooy8ZbfiIivi3s8Jdpc848IKQA3zUoFOC1m9N1mygiHnu5ABOPcArNXc430limv 1hng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MPdyZdXtLpy4ISH0JWi2t8HIOh1PC+bhXFK+4SBXlQo=; b=KHnS/nEWUDGVlSK3z3A7Y7m5/7upCR2YuMNRWlo8EeqN2NelB+V11OL9UPp1dIBoST hraa4ET48cm6SZOogMEc2UB95L3v4c+polbmp9F6z/mouvuMny/X5ganJ37nVJG384n/ C8XNwoj+YE8HxrRgSSQsZ5DKCgT3VXfxE9FlZkn/i+W1fdLh5SiRGURAXQBvJAB9CBLi W7YGASUcIWyn+uEkdVoMiis7T65MfjZJnnMGvvPWaMta/cMALqQLYbaVDCZ7XKGw/VTP 082eQR64i6jsjEYWkuMv48swb7TV44Q5VxNttMzFMsrpqqp5wP765kJk/TfW7bjx+3bL +hiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuumtOHdC6vdGzrAw2PBBKE3gOVO2VbXlJZB0XfO+1BCYy1deg7dfkT6qTxtyIFbQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.129.5 with SMTP id t5mr52354793pfd.32.1469649554468; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:5502:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:5502:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h125sm11185382pfg.54.2016.07.27.12.59.12 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAF4+nEHWP3k+2ikrpByVoEXwf0Rp7BuLAqTnk7n+aKxEQX3ZGg@mail.gmail.com> <20160726105626.881741A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <6.2.5.6.2.20160726230853.0ab08708@resistor.net> <CAA=duU2kV07aWk9CvnP4QA=8nynNS+bb23nCxNgJa3ut-be+eg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160727084251.0cb3cc58@elandnews.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <ba54fcd2-a96d-9ed3-d3e5-f882726a67b6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 07:59:16 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20160727084251.0cb3cc58@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2R_rsJKvG9sJIaVi7-qTUK_rTqg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 19:59:18 -0000

On 28/07/2016 04:33, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> At 05:23 27-07-2016, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>> Here's a concrete example. Photos of IETF plenaries have been published, online or otherwise, in various formats and venues,
>> such as on Facebook or on blogs. Sometimes I've spotted myself in the photos, in at least one case very visibly. However, it
>> is impratical to check with every single person attending the plenary to ask their permission ot publish the photos. Should
>> they be allowed to be published? I think so, even though I wasn't asked at the time.
> 
> The Note Well would not cover the above example as the venues do not look like venues where the organization conducts its work. 
> There are country-specific laws which regulate the publication of an image of a person.

Again, the Note Well doesn't replace local laws. It's a general warning that
you may be recorded and the recording may be published. If you get photographed in
Germany and it's published outside Germany, for example, I wouldn't place much
faith in the courts.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email