Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Sat, 09 November 2019 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D171200F7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 06:28:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62xg0JorxCvo; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 06:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC9C51200C5; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 06:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id m5so7803119ilq.0; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 06:28:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ofP2KrL1afEJq5wwE2OMCHiSRqkMfRMKRux8SWLtzWM=; b=EQLt79o6l1Rd67y5m4ujJVcRB7F+skwbm8hx20JTf5uoTEZZMaV8l2faXVCDwTcq10 219BSCJXFfwB87sTQV3gym1/DDH7RBbhEZdANB2XbuZgFpE43FDOqskhOVE3Mh+EsHCd 2lsgsF8ePeP7CMhSvO+52x4KdHeIEYIp2QifTrxAp/p0W6aREjGIBBebRJm6881u838v i6U6tjv53dx3qV4uo+dbalnxvtncuftWWXpUIEtSuWS3oTkQDDHLAhEVf0Cdlap5Wy+r ATeQhvfeoFinXDDQs4J2gF6q8QOhWBaBVQCTYWF1bgiX1VaH5UuR+lU/WIbb/32vrAnI WlBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ofP2KrL1afEJq5wwE2OMCHiSRqkMfRMKRux8SWLtzWM=; b=UNh2zCbPQOjzduUqAG4IR2sB4mMn6+weRWxc2UipnHVEcV6oxTJxkhvpldDI/7feH6 5ybh9xSfqR6n1NkPre47C9DxdgmISBC33V0m/eNocYOMD6x2s2ilB/QNo0kIeVOjjzUX Qlxg8/tuL3nmlhsgni4Yqhndv4wO4WwZHAwY6auUfQ1v+wIvl9675Z+5LyrTIhNfnYbQ QWPrIm1c5L34G1bq/cCu8LH5wg32CspylSqXE+cM9zMM7RLRn2cRFUcbXJ5DnKF+o5Sk pIiq7p7rPH/3rCL5u6IEymzXYsAqxiJFBkurGeNvoCEve171pYbOGOB9k8EOrrcQdA0+ 2j0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWqb+x2rPJFd2+/r/qPlcnUpj43NKTPyOBbMCG4pai8LttQ23bh sTQ4dUg7n+v86FVNiTvd843dLcYKVV3xOvlwR4o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxLiFeNDGKV8R7N+T5txQTmpaeDNIICnJSLNpIcTU/I+FvsGdXYJ/WGkX3gVZ8xZdYiFUpQdcx84HfwOWttNYE=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1612:: with SMTP id r18mr18741123ill.60.1573309684029; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 06:28:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <20191105155759.GC53355@widor3.jlc.net> <A0FD0FB4731A420424C65431@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <A0FD0FB4731A420424C65431@PSB>
From: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:27:52 -0600
Message-ID: <CABmDk8n3HUfDSssFM3QpDaDYY7whGTHb9+1GEiJv436OuctcTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
To: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
Cc: John Leslie <john@widor3.jlc.net>, NomCom Chair 2019 <nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d69dbd0596eab492"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1MtaJKbUwTdnGpGL0fdPj8LGfDs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 14:28:07 -0000
In DISPATCH WG, the whole point is to do a better job considering new work before chartering or even progressing as AD sponsored. We have told several folks that there was no interest in their work at IETF. Of course, they then go the ISE route, which honestly I don't necessarily have an issue with, but that work does come back to someone in the IETF with expertise in that area to do a review and as I'm recalling ADs have to consider whether there's any conflict. So, yes, it's really hard, if not impossible to tell people we're not going to spend any cycles on their pet project. And, unfortunately, it also depends upon who is bringing in the work. We are not the meritocracy that many think we are for several reasons. Regards, Mary. On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 8:13 AM John C Klensin <john@jck.com> wrote: > (top post) > > Let me add one additional comment to John's description of the > problem, which which I largely agree. He suggested that it had > become "entirely too difficult to say no to any new-group > proposal". I suggest that it has gotten even more difficult to > say no to anything emerging from a working group, no matter how > ill-conceived. Statistics about how long documents were sitting > in IESG evaluation, waiting for AD, or waiting for new draft > states might be very illuminating about this. > > best, > john > > > --On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 10:57 -0500 John Leslie > <john@widor3.jlc.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:54:52PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> > >> I wonder what people think would break if we moved to 5 AD's > >> per area, and they could divide the WG's and IESG concalls > >> amongst themselves? > > > > The whole process would break. :^( > > > > (I don't know whether that's good or bad...) > > > > Beyond question, the workload has become oppressive. > > > > Different IETF-Chairs have different approaches. Adapting > > to these changes, IMHO, has been challenging for IESG members. > > > > But the long-term trend has been to make it entirely too > > difficult to say no to any new-group proposal. A pair of > > WG-chairs is appointed, and the AD's don't have time to follow > > the actual process. > > > > Some WGCs listen very carefully to AD advice; others don't. > > Some ADs give very good advice early; others don't. > > > > But there's an endemic problem: enough of the hoi-polloi > > see each WG as the only possible way to "solve" their problem; > > and they develop tunnel vision. Thus anyone other than the AD > > who points out a problem is facing a cliff-like wall of > > resistance. > > > > This leads to problems entombed in published RFCs. > > > > It is rare for these problems to be solved -- ever. > > > > Beating your head against these entombed problems > > _seriously_ reduces the enthusiasm of ordinary IETF-ers to > > devote full-time to our process. > > > > :^( :^( :^( > > > > (Having basically retired from my full-time job, I have > > perhaps enough time available to work on this, but nowhere > > near enough money to cover $50,000 per year of out-of pocket > > expenses.) (Also, I hate air travel!) > > > > But perhaps, somebody else will explore alternatives to > > selecting only employer-sponsored folks for the IESG... > > > > -- > > John Leslie <john@jlc.net> > > > > > > >
- NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback NomCom Chair 2019
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stewart Bryant
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Paul Wouters
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Livingood, Jason
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Randy Bush
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Yoav Nir
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stephen Farrell
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stephen Farrell
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Tim Wicinski
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Rob Sayre
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Bob Hinden
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Donald Eastlake
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John Levine
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stewart Bryant
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Michael Richardson
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Communi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Mark Nottingham
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Rob Sayre
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Terry Manderson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Quality of Directorate reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- RE: Quality of Directorate reviews Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- RE: Quality of Directorate reviews Paul Wouters
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Carsten Bormann
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Salz, Rich
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Jared Mauch
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Salz, Rich
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate re… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Leif Johansson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… tom petch
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Salz, Rich
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Christian Huitema
- Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: Thou… Jari Arkko
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Eliot Lear
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Ole Troan
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Keith Moore
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John Leslie
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Michael Richardson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Mary B
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Carsten Bormann
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Julian Reschke
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Mark Nottingham