Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]
tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1C6120953 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:08:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXe8TFPdzt1K for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:08:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr140131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.14.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC14012094C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:08:27 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bpnt0zJ9gtx/j7UPSP5ylfdzRTFWfJ12xmpXQ1wTjstFqLvL6w72S+TY4QQAFhtZvm5/ZsqisEWziFYfLIX/7Edt2MjZ30FO6Qh8ACi5XRtrcXdyxHsHo3LezaRr0XnpiFU06s7A+oqo37k6OXpG/UY6ZnAtAT5JUne7QVZumytzcSac/v5feBRuCkE5p4gUrNtEncMCN9kvBvXiRDh4GTWxRllEL2vw+PLnRHIqGKW5YqDJvu0Wx8B8UEZyx7nL1teyBYwZULE3ylZrLo52yVl6cyVUpQwT0USMpC9tXpx7+LTDxrtwn7kQBiJm47oDZ/KDGx4SuTOrVmNdv0Uwjw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HnbAhbVc8alzbCoMnnFiQ/pnz3ZBqkuMrL4as4DWDKA=; b=nxDO+NY+ynL192UfgsXbwiQvq5eiYWzrXv2kOmI4FFcOfSMsqXaHbEDZpPwRvPS6D4CmAnDGN0E+BD+Peiv/R2oj5G7pMO5nguvN/HkJi46In4KCfYW8bmmj2Li7oJyVALrcVNt9nmrz443vd+woqgVpR47lJl+29+jBv38g/WkFPiRJ1Ky1KmaHGlS+lusTCGF2N/l8M5wt1HdgFpSlAmJ7qalUx6jIpB+EvH4g13N70UhslgnEOBvxCrA7y9QUxRpc1ksYhYmhJULmHoYud/G5pix6kklrmy258urc0gJKlsjSpB/N8rftehA31eHHBLMp45S9rww3ziX2JqLkyA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HnbAhbVc8alzbCoMnnFiQ/pnz3ZBqkuMrL4as4DWDKA=; b=c6RxIbDVQw1vBHVpXshQfrFYExoKB637g7sxYZcZ9zEuahLHZLNrEr6bU3fsaDWXTTHdMA+WBPnSTnFxb6DCXuDU8bWGPujTDq8OXrH3vS3qFJdRJjoW1ZOIhy96QpjdSM2BQ02rbOmA2lFKOJgNyvsUXDlBTY2U/oG0pgmrptg=
Received: from AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.115.216) by AM0PR07MB5299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.19.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.16; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:08:25 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8d07:c426:c2d7:51f2]) by AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8d07:c426:c2d7:51f2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2430.014; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:08:25 +0000
From: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
CC: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]
Thread-Topic: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]
Thread-Index: AQHVlY33J9NSD7+fB0K0nl3D5uidOA==
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 17:08:25 +0000
Message-ID: <00f901d5958d$8e95b180$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <26819.1572990657@localhost> <2668fa45-7667-51a6-7cb6-4b704c7fba5a@isode.com> <2C97D18E-3DA0-4A2D-8179-6D86EB835783@gmail.com> <91686B28-9583-4A8E-AF8A-E66977B1FE13@gmail.com> <012b9437-4440-915c-f1f9-b85e1b0be768@gmail.com> <20191107014849.GC12148@localhost> <57465486-71b1-a87a-fa8c-bad7157f9025@gmail.com> <20191107050221.GD12148@localhost> <18D4ABF5-2FAE-446D-B23C-182E61BA1ACB@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P265CA0428.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:a0::32) To AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:11e::24)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=daedulus@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-originating-ip: [86.139.211.103]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 81eb886d-1da2-480b-3759-08d763a519de
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB5299:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB52997102EF672F4F8F466D5EC6780@AM0PR07MB5299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0214EB3F68
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(256004)(9686003)(44716002)(25786009)(446003)(2906002)(44736005)(6116002)(6436002)(6486002)(478600001)(1556002)(6246003)(7736002)(81156014)(81166006)(61296003)(3846002)(50226002)(8936002)(6512007)(66476007)(8676002)(14454004)(66946007)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(102836004)(386003)(486006)(66066001)(62236002)(81686011)(316002)(229853002)(81816011)(71200400001)(71190400001)(4326008)(26005)(305945005)(6506007)(52116002)(186003)(76176011)(14496001)(110136005)(99286004)(4720700003)(53546011)(5660300002)(476003)(86362001)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB5299; H:AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gd+xim0HWJSJ/jhMrp+2sddFbkmkeXTOL9Mm96W5qF8N0jwE84CIxXl4hwjz0mq+xGkLuCJZgwSAdPVRLkOjWQ6jxZDGQnvV7lVEB01Rwo1rMK/qphMv8LpeqplYYM1KcSp2rmEzksMYUH/N7kzuj3p++JIYq9whXdReh4ktjaLesIZNZr8Nnq2aIeBGX1h6uLotTtPg0q/jesh+fkMI/TBGWD+9KjqpjeJ4owoMMHMCbDK394Q0NpsNhlXo2aQvKpTmVAi3uieboF7nurGoGZdlj2FqoS65794lZjMZpih/MQJIxXY0XN8Nb0OcXe5X+kSOMqlLggu0hLwwKqGBUXG/Gns4GZXokusJM5J/pcLgHo83sZcA5SCqR39ED0RbNzPE8FCf2nCYrAIgH0eGHnBDDYHO0oL2BCHQw5Qs3Cz+z5f8eMS0xF5ZggiBTMXc
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <79ED32E399DE69439ECBC702AAFA54E1@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 81eb886d-1da2-480b-3759-08d763a519de
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Nov 2019 17:08:25.3550 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: j6uHRdyBjwYJ6iRS1nCPB9d15kJHtQZ/ZQkeijHMajqjKfE97yuEOHjyCs8D/IQHk1BcY39RX6sR+6SVSY0dtg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB5299
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NswYlJg3Vx5mZ2_3R28aISYsgvc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 17:08:30 -0000
<inline> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Hinden" <bob.hinden@gmail.com> To: "Nico Williams" <nico@cryptonector.com> Cc: "IETF" <ietf@ietf.org>; "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>; "Bob Hinden" <bob.hinden@gmail.com>; "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 4:29 PM Nico, > On Nov 6, 2019, at 9:02 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > ….. >> Secondly, they'd still be the authority for chartering, appointing >> WG chairs, appointing directorates, and other aspects of overseeing >> the process. Most of the duties described in RFC 2026 in fact. > > Sure, but picking good chairs now becomes essential, but finding chairs > as good as ADs will be difficult. I agree that picking good chairs is essential (it is now too), but a w.g. chair’s job is not full time. They only have to manage and review the documents in their working group. The biggest issue with finding qualified people to be ADs is that it is essentially a full time job. Finding qualified people to be w.g. chairs is easier and there is a bigger pool of qualified people because it isn’t a full time job. <tp> And yet the quality of chairs seems lacking which then puts a greater load on the ADs. A general principle of doing anything is that the earlier you fix the issue, the less expensive it is to fix so a defect that is fixed just after WG adoption will cost less effort than one that gets fixed at IESG review. I see comments from myself and others not acted on even when they are (to me) basic such as line lengths of 100+ characters which makes them hard to read; or an absence of any normative references which means I cannot tell if I should expect to understand this I-D; an IANA section that registers 'n' YANG modules when the I-D contains 'm' YANG modules where n>>m or m>>n. These tend to get fixed before IETF Last Call but less basic ones may not be; the issues were raised on the WG list and then the person raising them says 'What about the issues I raised two months ago and which are still there?' I am pointing a finger at WG Chairs who let unresolved issues run and run; that costs, everyone. And I see this in several of the WGs that I track, as well as never seeing it in others; I believe that the difference lies in the WG Chairs but all I can do is post comments to the WG List - when they are not acted on, then I am ....ed Tom Petch Bob
- NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback NomCom Chair 2019
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stewart Bryant
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Paul Wouters
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Livingood, Jason
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Randy Bush
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Yoav Nir
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stephen Farrell
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stephen Farrell
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Tim Wicinski
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Rob Sayre
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Bob Hinden
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Donald Eastlake
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John Levine
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stewart Bryant
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Michael Richardson
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Communi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Mark Nottingham
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Rob Sayre
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Terry Manderson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Quality of Directorate reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- RE: Quality of Directorate reviews Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- RE: Quality of Directorate reviews Paul Wouters
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Carsten Bormann
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Salz, Rich
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Jared Mauch
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Salz, Rich
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate re… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Leif Johansson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… tom petch
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Salz, Rich
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Christian Huitema
- Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: Thou… Jari Arkko
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Eliot Lear
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Ole Troan
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Keith Moore
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John Leslie
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Michael Richardson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Mary B
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Carsten Bormann
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Julian Reschke
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Mark Nottingham