IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 23 April 2018 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F26212D963; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XM6u3ZeENUgD; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6612612D95A; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b5so9253670pgv.5; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nauw/inUBzCOWDtz/qyAQMfrV/LsjcajT+zbSBS76uU=; b=IT95wIVkR9JHxxHRIdqRZEuxSG81RkT6gKaDnf7mvxkVs6pCayLbfIkzzvHhYgLP5K JTWfZubjY8CZap7EWj26L5rauIGMSCMveYInblgFOKHfKV64rpHltgAa5ODhyQh/nb4f JYJO5m6M01sulZSPyR1juQliC0ul3PBI59+bNfefOU4aC4mOuMxG4sbNoMgsNvn2FVfY MifQb1PcUM0RWMbC1Kdld1y5g3PQQpTKLP3YxseFy5UREfUOfwwDZGJnK56Hs/nibdNv 5jvSBx9mkbUqLyJGqsDSI0r/nPEKdCrgv8/L83psiJ5oSxvfGZhjzjN7c8Ubco/7v1T9 I+bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nauw/inUBzCOWDtz/qyAQMfrV/LsjcajT+zbSBS76uU=; b=KnBGQoiwvQCD7KcLrtV0FPMZPgTbH7P1ErMXDo7+3Sjw5LwC65muUA/2aiGawUqopT s8/x6Sd5fqw+zBFjxZ1L0xWarYlIOdADAzQIcVb9CSwU1o4Y0lrWnEvzlvPLG9iiNFhh 6kDo2tHqlnF0EsS4hjcN4yeZr+z1zDnQ1gJHQWVDEX3cCzpfQe+hY1cu0W240SUY6Lkj ysf4ewAyZ5m1Nqh5ncM2wkfucU0LMNFwbM3SvpsZPtqygFwOa+gGS00fwC1AjMy3+Cvj UIZp7LxbLMQGnwjcdK7fCR2HKFlM6iyPdoVOa1VUvQTeh7v51cb0JVgOA/rFv51PkZTd Y0PA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCoR50zUKBw+FFG1ksUymhXP4VspGH0tEIFJRJYevwmgnZGQygR HjiYDko0+CNjXGsL1wJz2ZE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+eh5tfN6frW5suIg+Hjhs9Tkg0ETmMj/jy5ShRngj6lbG6wi5dzHZVb/Y9LUTSqtoco+bybA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1a6:: with SMTP id b35-v6mr19902247plb.80.1524518920859; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb90:9db2:6520:815:b29e:682f:94e3? ([2607:fb90:9db2:6520:815:b29e:682f:94e3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s7sm22509997pfm.114.2018.04.23.14.28.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15E216)
In-Reply-To: <6C706BC3-F36F-4FB2-B3C3-AD72F26F854B@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:28:38 -0700
Cc: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <69A142DC-A7BD-4898-A5A5-A5AAE59661C3@gmail.com>
References: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180419013457.fq4ruqj7p4lfwxb4@mx4.yitter.info> <CABcZeBPXUqe6ixF+Yx7P6E3Jt3fGjAMUrP368DTedGq-O-T61Q@mail.gmail.com> <ED191002-261F-4E3C-A359-CBFEF1812AF8@iii.ca> <531F8285-71D0-4EFD-AC2D-C96DD98E4F44@fugue.com> <23d1e398-887d-4c7c-2c9d-da9fad200415@cs.tcd.ie> <b4a8b4a7-7919-df3f-f301-1cd634f4900c@nostrum.com> <115F383E-49E6-4237-849D-E36B26DA977B@cisco.com> <9768922C-6FE9-48BF-8E98-623B3B4960CF@gmail.com> <8013c41b-242b-6e7e-46d5-41f49456045d@gmail.com> <6C706BC3-F36F-4FB2-B3C3-AD72F26F854B@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1qMQDkXluM06WfcWcDzRdSddlL0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 21:28:43 -0000

+1

Regards,
Jeff

> On Apr 23, 2018, at 12:13, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> asians have told us that Honolulu and Vancouver were easy enough for asians to get to
>> 
>> As I said at one point in the WG discussions, many people (including the fine folk at APNIC) think of the region as "Asia Pacific", which certainly includes Hawaii (not notorious for being part of North America) and YVR at a stretch.
>> 
>> But there was no consensus in the WG to change "Asia" to "Asia Pacific".
> 
> I support the use of "Asia Pacific" to include Australia as well.
> 
> Russ
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email