IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 23 April 2018 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9E2126FDC; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4s4YjKYJ5BJA; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67133126D85; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id v63so1010121pfk.8; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FCWkfQOIcAHM8+8vx4HRFIu7CiPKCnvTmGFvH9SgJXI=; b=JT8rjT66rfsmuRlqOqEpimPHUrA8jObb9WU9uLh/WACrMlsRLkNlJ/+6GfyGv1A8lj 3s6GRu5D/S0WqDmiXSJfb3wSNpOmh8GTWO210sAHtzsdAQKnGQv53eNXBP3EtnnpfGEc freVrD8FyyQhaiYG4KEyon0GGdkexADwS0+sgOgCZ7y+kVNx8IL2e3ANQRyZxgt1NY1c 27losoZ+5iUvDcnUsJYF+tCY6Ql83XYX+q6621sVNGIvKt/97TwV0aOZH5tbrKEiMREl fbCxRu8uw8G5GOQM6Wqc14LhN0HgN7biFj76OVamYswKPvWRdaCzzVa3G1fnqUbH8lkx 0QgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FCWkfQOIcAHM8+8vx4HRFIu7CiPKCnvTmGFvH9SgJXI=; b=UWs0JnhhhNs5b5v/6YcByfnJ+Aq/lRfpVmLlT3k2p8Iu5DadYupiw8bB/Ys8MbgKIk E/DTfUjJEEGh+1CRgMzlibb+J6qNNm8orHbqxcjoKFzWYyEJVxqJMgOC4nBBsQOHndnk 3axhOFrrc0r9OxZVesY9PDtLiZ7F6287GOmHbdUFHQQItcbYO0MDgF6+C/MOpp3U8yXb RLF/nhoTFUUnMiEUIZ+Cx0zfOqIKVyGN//cy47InowxtqCcZNIuaampfoTWTjyldImd6 /Atz7bjLaQcgQU43H1WUFVbcda+Tc8QWgTLBmH8joHIL5hbUQeBlibraawkfRfJ/DoY7 LGAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAAnf/HB3habiI4I0ULk8DRKpj03NjOmbqvXWIrgszagCzOIzkM IpZZMkKrtMe0CFFVvdluo8FP1Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZr3ceANmHnKRq8/bk6yMGNb5cMw4uPLKHir6zMZTmOBYRIVY4VSwxeoqNaLIhjPnIuQ7QN6nA==
X-Received: by 10.98.174.19 with SMTP id q19mr1920930pff.155.1524525958513; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] ([118.149.104.73]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b4sm23658381pfa.64.2018.04.23.16.25.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180419013457.fq4ruqj7p4lfwxb4@mx4.yitter.info> <CABcZeBPXUqe6ixF+Yx7P6E3Jt3fGjAMUrP368DTedGq-O-T61Q@mail.gmail.com> <ED191002-261F-4E3C-A359-CBFEF1812AF8@iii.ca> <531F8285-71D0-4EFD-AC2D-C96DD98E4F44@fugue.com> <23d1e398-887d-4c7c-2c9d-da9fad200415@cs.tcd.ie> <b4a8b4a7-7919-df3f-f301-1cd634f4900c@nostrum.com> <115F383E-49E6-4237-849D-E36B26DA977B@cisco.com> <9768922C-6FE9-48BF-8E98-623B3B4960CF@gmail.com> <8013c41b-242b-6e7e-46d5-41f49456045d@gmail.com> <6C706BC3-F36F-4FB2-B3C3-AD72F26F854B@vigilsec.com> <m2o9i97hbt.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <94f7064f-4c8e-b77c-9754-b2576d25380e@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:25:57 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2o9i97hbt.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sbo3LlZKDcVSpOfsISHTFyMhux8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:26:01 -0000

On 24/04/2018 09:17, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> As I said at one point in the WG discussions, many people (including
>>> the fine folk at APNIC) think of the region as "Asia Pacific", which
>>> certainly includes Hawaii (not notorious for being part of North
>>> America) and YVR at a stretch. 
>>>
>>> But there was no consensus in the WG to change "Asia" to "Asia Pacific".
>>
>> I support the use of "Asia Pacific" to include Australia as well.

And Aotearoa, I hope ;-)
 
> agree.  but i emphatically do not support including hawai`i and
> vancouver.  the latter is clearly in north america.  hawai`i has
> the american visa and other barricades.

Yes, but the flying time from other points on the Pacific Rim is
reasonable. However, I think keeping the boundary vague is fine.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email