Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sun, 22 April 2018 21:07 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEDA126D85 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIrKJDV__pbL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF1E1200F1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B8F1E0B7A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:07:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id dZ7q1x0082SSUrH01Z7tze; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:07:54 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=G85sK5s5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=Kd1tUaAdevIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=5IsXbjgYAAAA:8 a=Pf6QpW2kAAAA:8 a=oa6j-BqsC6F_mYqsYVYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22 a=RR2nPHISKLg-FD_FhCoU:22 a=aScfhB3owP0e7kdt9tb6:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SOeqzKNu6UDsBRhgPHaOr4BkjYeiJEr8IctvgSRr2IA=; b=twYd3P13cOHo34XM/22NVFgL31 sxo3cAVMEKE4Xqhvg+a2OwoPt/GxbDNiUUC13TNMRIrR+7WCNyw2UoXu0D5G4LIDvPOx3G6z3sedp ykeroOa2NKbTwd9ajFHb00cCO;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:49566 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1fAMD8-001u34-0u; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:07:50 -0600
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180419013457.fq4ruqj7p4lfwxb4@mx4.yitter.info> <CABcZeBPXUqe6ixF+Yx7P6E3Jt3fGjAMUrP368DTedGq-O-T61Q@mail.gmail.com> <0adb9534-75b7-4811-7cf0-4c13385bd434@labn.net> <021b01d3da78$b0b292a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <056ef849-55ef-f9e0-2166-04a506f86c5d@labn.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:07:49 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <021b01d3da78$b0b292a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1fAMD8-001u34-0u
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:49566
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7h6If8ILJJ8vnrvUPdjWxU9O5hg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 21:07:58 -0000
Tom, The data is public. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/stats/meeting/country/ for the graph of what you're looking for... Lou On 4/22/2018 4:29 PM, tom p. wrote: > Lou > > The analysis that would interest me, if it were possible, would be the > trend for participants from China, suitably adjusted for the location of > the meeting. I suspect that, just as it is > forecast that the world's largest economy will be, in due course, China, > so some time later, the majority of participants at the IETF will be > from > China! As an occasional attendee, I notice each time how many more > people appear to be from that country; the London plenary quoted a > figure of 9%, as I recall, a figure much greater than for any other > continental European country. > > I see the centre of gravity of the IETF shifting. > > Tom Petch > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> > To: "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com>; "Andrew Sullivan" > <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> > Cc: <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; "IETF discussion list" <ietf@ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 9:02 PM > >> On 4/19/2018 8:36 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >>> ... >>> >>> First, if you look at historical demographics, over the past 12 > IETFs, >>> we have 23% Asia, 26% Europe, and 42% NA). Put another way, the last >>> time we had > 1/3 Asian attendance was IETF 94 in Yokohama, and the >>> last time we had less than 1/3 NA attendance was IETF 79 in Beijing. >>> So, a policy that was designed to match per-continent attendance > would >>> be more like 2-1-1-*. >> FWIW looking at the public data [1] for IETF 72-101 the attendee >> distribution is as follows: >> >> Meetings in Asia -- 6686 Total attendees over 6 meetings: >> Attendees from >> 36% North America >> 21% Europe >> 41% Asia >> 2% Other >> >> Meetings in North America -- 13878 Total attendees over 12 meetings: >> Attendees from >> 57% North America >> 22% Europe >> 19% Asia >> 2% Other >> >> Meetings in Europe -- 14236 Total attendees over 11 meetings: >> Attendees from >> 39% North America >> 39% Europe >> 20% Asia >> 2% Other >> >> For All Meetings -- 35843 Total attendees over 29 meetings: (basically >> the same as ekr's numbers) >> Attendees from >> 45% North America >> 29% Europe >> 23% Asia >> 2% Other >> >> Lou >> >> [1] starting at https://datatracker.ietf.org/stats/meeting/ (in the >> above, asia includes numbers reported under "oceana") >> >
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: 1-1-1 or whateverm was … John Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Adam Roach
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: 1-1-1 or whateverm was … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… tom p.
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… John Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Fred Baker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Russ Housley
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Randy Bush
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Suresh Krishnan
- Venue definition and distribution comments summar… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Venue definition and distribution comments su… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Alissa Cooper