IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 23 April 2018 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D70F12DA02; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Az41_duVya1X; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6EE12DA00; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1fAiqU-0002wW-Pb; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 21:17:58 +0000
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:17:58 -0700
Message-ID: <m2o9i97hbt.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <6C706BC3-F36F-4FB2-B3C3-AD72F26F854B@vigilsec.com>
References: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180419013457.fq4ruqj7p4lfwxb4@mx4.yitter.info> <CABcZeBPXUqe6ixF+Yx7P6E3Jt3fGjAMUrP368DTedGq-O-T61Q@mail.gmail.com> <ED191002-261F-4E3C-A359-CBFEF1812AF8@iii.ca> <531F8285-71D0-4EFD-AC2D-C96DD98E4F44@fugue.com> <23d1e398-887d-4c7c-2c9d-da9fad200415@cs.tcd.ie> <b4a8b4a7-7919-df3f-f301-1cd634f4900c@nostrum.com> <115F383E-49E6-4237-849D-E36B26DA977B@cisco.com> <9768922C-6FE9-48BF-8E98-623B3B4960CF@gmail.com> <8013c41b-242b-6e7e-46d5-41f49456045d@gmail.com> <6C706BC3-F36F-4FB2-B3C3-AD72F26F854B@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wZhDBC0THQIlah6DhZqs5b_Irak>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 21:18:03 -0000

>> As I said at one point in the WG discussions, many people (including
>> the fine folk at APNIC) think of the region as "Asia Pacific", which
>> certainly includes Hawaii (not notorious for being part of North
>> America) and YVR at a stretch. 
>> 
>> But there was no consensus in the WG to change "Asia" to "Asia Pacific".
> 
> I support the use of "Asia Pacific" to include Australia as well.

agree.  but i emphatically do not support including hawai`i and
vancouver.  the latter is clearly in north america.  hawai`i has
the american visa and other barricades.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email