Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 23 April 2018 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8EA126C0F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3k-fH4MrTgun for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A2512D810 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C5F300A0C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:13:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id q2g3g8jnFV2M for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:13:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from new-host-4.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A0FF300434; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:13:47 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <8013c41b-242b-6e7e-46d5-41f49456045d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:13:48 -0400
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6C706BC3-F36F-4FB2-B3C3-AD72F26F854B@vigilsec.com>
References: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180419013457.fq4ruqj7p4lfwxb4@mx4.yitter.info> <CABcZeBPXUqe6ixF+Yx7P6E3Jt3fGjAMUrP368DTedGq-O-T61Q@mail.gmail.com> <ED191002-261F-4E3C-A359-CBFEF1812AF8@iii.ca> <531F8285-71D0-4EFD-AC2D-C96DD98E4F44@fugue.com> <23d1e398-887d-4c7c-2c9d-da9fad200415@cs.tcd.ie> <b4a8b4a7-7919-df3f-f301-1cd634f4900c@nostrum.com> <115F383E-49E6-4237-849D-E36B26DA977B@cisco.com> <9768922C-6FE9-48BF-8E98-623B3B4960CF@gmail.com> <8013c41b-242b-6e7e-46d5-41f49456045d@gmail.com>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gQ0zS7CwyUpY0j7Q7lVb1gHgDws>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 19:13:52 -0000

>> asians have told us that Honolulu and Vancouver were easy enough for asians to get to
> 
> As I said at one point in the WG discussions, many people (including the fine folk at APNIC) think of the region as "Asia Pacific", which certainly includes Hawaii (not notorious for being part of North America) and YVR at a stretch.
> 
> But there was no consensus in the WG to change "Asia" to "Asia Pacific".

I support the use of "Asia Pacific" to include Australia as well.

Russ