IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 22 April 2018 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA5D126D85; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jREBpewz87Ga; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9421200FC; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id i6so7017352pgv.3; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O2XXXEKmGBAE66gd6SRzFQnU8WL2sOBDXOAsElMyseI=; b=Gg4Ltj+h2H15z9udkiI1VaX57RFu3fD51dOH6Mz3IH8nq2qOeyBqw8KdZABw+WorEI VY2udtNBarEYEkEt3Izm3ch+Z67Cr+chlxjSNDu/NORGWPL6JcqTRFfPvvKeR+EtWDxd Wgp+RXSfs9u0qJS1OfxjNEwNVjwRlhAyF8vvYfpvw/F2BXygcVCzjgzjnE5uBTjtfP/c GsQ02D2zFYadxNGITB1cf7r/Cz2s89yDGbkZOuHR5V6B3sN6RSvicBaTgmvnPy6pAjum dke9WYfnr4GXxQlqwRcJCdUJkgyDnQSplsuialRQvHx/FTvEvZ4BBKYuoDAB0PNw3tGO KrUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O2XXXEKmGBAE66gd6SRzFQnU8WL2sOBDXOAsElMyseI=; b=ruF3mgE9RI68H66cek9HYFPEutvgZEIB1GJflRXPRfvrgIcf8ctRWUnmx9HK+3Af76 2aqGhiOWPye1v+Ix+v2Ogl0V0KREXpQof78DI26UqqEHXQG2lQ8oV/8haAXa8mdQsA8F UMTz2ysIZkqueg/OxOIT1cku12QsrYl/A0A17uVMjfGt/2dbR7i8ZtYCKbgBaR2J1O+j cZPP40ER0XXNxYPdO4MPGxBqaxZuQMQQLhP45jSP0NOF1k4KhbkqibsQjU8cV72RG3CO n8U2k9L6lTKSSt+b1gP3h8LJMj2jmIAuwgTJZU4HyOwikr5CGndJvMVKW+3yCTGPgzwn 1r1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tD0tSbbLPvE5U4He8TmJfbozRmyN1ys83tBuhSIXNbXPypne+86 3cxpX4wxXWnR/A2mxQdF6sRylg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+0j/NRkQXDdP9VOuwEpxZ8lRrgqqrGE6i8JrXim9hToat4qI0SwGwPzt4+WSSH5MabcBC5yQ==
X-Received: by 10.167.132.207 with SMTP id x15mr8202597pfn.46.1524436360710; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.11] (sc-cs-567-laptop.uoa.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.38.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y14sm18206988pfe.172.2018.04.22.15.32.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180419013457.fq4ruqj7p4lfwxb4@mx4.yitter.info> <CABcZeBPXUqe6ixF+Yx7P6E3Jt3fGjAMUrP368DTedGq-O-T61Q@mail.gmail.com> <ED191002-261F-4E3C-A359-CBFEF1812AF8@iii.ca> <531F8285-71D0-4EFD-AC2D-C96DD98E4F44@fugue.com> <23d1e398-887d-4c7c-2c9d-da9fad200415@cs.tcd.ie> <b4a8b4a7-7919-df3f-f301-1cd634f4900c@nostrum.com> <115F383E-49E6-4237-849D-E36B26DA977B@cisco.com> <9768922C-6FE9-48BF-8E98-623B3B4960CF@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8013c41b-242b-6e7e-46d5-41f49456045d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:32:36 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9768922C-6FE9-48BF-8E98-623B3B4960CF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Hl5GU2pcpQgWL-4O9EOeh2yoUm4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:32:43 -0000

Fred,

> asians have told us that Honolulu and Vancouver were easy enough for asians to get to

As I said at one point in the WG discussions, many people (including the fine folk at APNIC) think of the region as "Asia Pacific", which certainly includes Hawaii (not notorious for being part of North America) and YVR at a stretch.

But there was no consensus in the WG to change "Asia" to "Asia Pacific".

Regards
   Brian
   (an Asia-Pacifican, also a Pakeha, but neither Asian nor Pacifica)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email