IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 30 July 2020 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12B13A09AD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXjbodkvAJ-R for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACDA83A09BA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9084548440; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:58:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id AE7E2440043; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:58:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:58:17 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town
Message-ID: <20200730185817.GA12035@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <024001d66664$ebdc3b90$c394b2b0$@olddog.co.uk> <a9267787-d24a-25af-2e99-fe87b74a2640@bogus.com> <78F02C48B3ACFADD958D87D6@PSB> <CAHbuEH6xAuuXvLW=L8Q8B+qdBb=nds83sP+fOeA_M2kW9UtDPA@mail.gmail.com> <20200730172714.GM3100@localhost> <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2007301342150.417154@bofh.nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2007301342150.417154@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3YIQPSfSZNR3knusDEAeA6DbsG0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 18:58:32 -0000

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:46:48PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > We might want to consider spreadign remote-only meetings over two weeks
> > instead of one.
> 
> Please don't :)

ITU-T meeting in parallel to IETF is in it's second week, i also think each
days schedule is longer than IETF. Ask ITU-T attendees from outside Europe what
they make of that.

Maybe there is an algorithm to shift the IETF meeting times across the week
such different days favor different TZ attendees as opposed to now where
its always Europe happy, Ameria West Coast and China not happy.

Cheers
     Toerless

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email