Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B0B3A124A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgMEelAUfY1x for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6522D3A1289 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id i138so16744042ild.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a+KT0S+5y7fJ40YBGYj/Wk7BrR8FeMpchb0ctahOKtQ=; b=N1eIQ43K1N0HJbHEdeobC46CxdtmGJPhocJrIu+ihlh6Y7D2t4x4ExrSAAxbwv3MVW 5Lmhd8Q+dP9Dr/fw5S/EdhwynuexLGKPY0R4SmrV2KOsg4cMldbSxWihtGG4qW6g3YsD mBROflU9nj5P9bexUoDTAmfZD6IwEghnJ9fNob52ykSSozQHbqfslxwkt6bqnQGEjeB8 wx127aVZKKXtAfZKoc8bPUcOfZ9qvZP2qPMm0KFicJyoM9GSIxegnj3ZTYmMA3WzTaMK 2574YcF2YKCgFZ7NMSVgb++WJS61DpaMQloYjgaDsh95MvezuPskypGEPFOwvwRg0mLU qLwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a+KT0S+5y7fJ40YBGYj/Wk7BrR8FeMpchb0ctahOKtQ=; b=UqE8p+spc/uDx5XfYwuQWjO8Td4Yo7qoTLWtLeLGbJ8C1CqLtUugTn6vrg8JGwGD/T 0dehCosdvrnt3IJlQY7KHv4Ocbcc1bPuw4x0UsbkjhOjeYRNWPs2vrYeKJfPYHwye8bA joo0V7TsG4G7fJJIBFghx8a1ilZKvgJ2oWWMysZWLv24tGmjgM0tTHDKh/O8gedLPxlj KTHUlxYehfTyHAJEFQPdxoKqC1YGAkh+2BhH8kNHlpLg6QhQU4AOwmnM8+FjGWfuzHxF UumioNPsWSn9fIFgZpJNN2iePEDJ4G9JhMADur37IpwhW4IXW4lQkt7X/cA4bgJDka4t EP8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PUj3mD/IKAvfQHK3u8sO9MbmCFS7fb9pN82cyLxPFyayVfzC8 XINKl8OVs9Fa6fTeQVYurdGY9krrdRP2KSA0CvvEtA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzInTxWLTLJM5uu5gUmy1bjG1552QVXkXPglaeqn60l+WpQhnDw5SiQzk3WwSvsZGk/xg451qsW5Z737iO+qCA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1405:: with SMTP id n5mr33677935ilo.87.1596120363676; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <024001d66664$ebdc3b90$c394b2b0$@olddog.co.uk> <a9267787-d24a-25af-2e99-fe87b74a2640@bogus.com> <78F02C48B3ACFADD958D87D6@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <78F02C48B3ACFADD958D87D6@PSB>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:45:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6xAuuXvLW=L8Q8B+qdBb=nds83sP+fOeA_M2kW9UtDPA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004bbb2405aba9bb04"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fY8DcbDAm1ECTdqYFZe1uEQOu5E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:46:23 -0000

I've just had other obligations, although the one time I was on it was
great.  It may be useful to have regular meetup times where people know to
go and chat throughout the year.  Maybe weekly and targeted at time zone
convenient/changing times.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:27 AM John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>
>
> --On Thursday, July 30, 2020 05:09 -0700 joel jaeggli
> <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/30/20 04:30, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Am I the only one to miss random corridor conversations that
> >> happen at face-to-face IETF meetings?
> >>
> >> Of course, planned coffee-time meet-ups can still be
> >> scheduled using a variety of meeting tools, but the casual
> >> bumping in to people and talking about things, and (better
> >> still) hooking into other people's conversations to learn and
> >> share, is a real loss.
> >>
> >> So I have been hanging around in Gather.Town
> >> (https://ietf.gather.town/z6N2SDxHebMdDAfo/IETF-108) and
> >> found this has worked quite nicely for exactly that reason.
> >> Quick hellos, short chats, or longer rambling debates have
> >> all been working nicely.
> >>
> >> But where is everybody? The number of people in the
> >> application seems to range between 20 and 50.
> >>
> >> Is the problem that Gather.Town makes you run all sorts of
> >> scripts that might be a bit icky? Or are we all really just
> >> antisocial?
> >
> > Being in an inconvenient time zone this time has led to me for
> > example being somewhat parsimonious with time, i suspect that
> > others may have similar considerations. concurrency with
> > timezone distributed communities is hard.
>
> While my time zone is a few hours less inconvenient than Joel's,
> one advantage of all-day meetings, especially f2f ones where
> almost everyone is off-site relative to their normal locations
> is that IETF (including informal conversations and small
> meetings) becomes the almost exclusive focus of attention for
> the week.  Cut that to about five hours, especially in a time
> zone that leaves half the "normal" workday free, and monitoring
> a group because something _might_ happen gets hard.  And, as
> Christian pointed out, I will not have my mic and camera active
> when I'm not paying very active attention to a particular
> session/application (and, yeah, icky and possibly somewhat
> unconstrained scripts are another part of that problem).
>
> It also looks like something whose controls, etc., would take
> some getting used to and time this week (or last) to figure it
> out is, umm, limited.  And, at least for me, the screen,
> especially the very small black user name characters on a
> striped dark brown background, is essentially unreadable, which
> is another deterrent.
>
>    john
>
>

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen