Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4F73A0CE6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMbZHhgBbdys for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crocodile.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (crocodile.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73BED3A0FDE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EEB216A8; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:27:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a100.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-9-43.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.9.43]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8CE2320793; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:27:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a100.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:27:19 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Befitting-Irritate: 10627403269b3b15_1596130039833_3121661635
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1596130039833:1819708940
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1596130039833
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a100.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a100.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2711FB38FA; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=uL0mZS7jC4IiWF GEC7cYAYd7aLM=; b=kOPvDeOSiLIb4AjQc4Ru4GxEPnOCAv4SA5OmAl0FfZkZ5n kCfqFTl6xwQjT1NAE0dOUWgCqX8t8L5kb4zVkOWXq5YsE5neiBiWV405hl7pK+z7 j44R34jXSEXRumt5dGv4N8g63EPXxltusmLUIKceBCtp1qhB2Q1qOezp5k6p4=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a100.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A13E2B38F7; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:27:15 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a100
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town
Message-ID: <20200730172714.GM3100@localhost>
References: <024001d66664$ebdc3b90$c394b2b0$@olddog.co.uk> <a9267787-d24a-25af-2e99-fe87b74a2640@bogus.com> <78F02C48B3ACFADD958D87D6@PSB> <CAHbuEH6xAuuXvLW=L8Q8B+qdBb=nds83sP+fOeA_M2kW9UtDPA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH6xAuuXvLW=L8Q8B+qdBb=nds83sP+fOeA_M2kW9UtDPA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrieeigdduudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdtkeethfeuteeviefgfeegjeetjedvhfehgfdvtdefueejheelgeeuhffghffgnecukfhppedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpihhnvghtpedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtohepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IiMQq967Cj9KnFOobsIhy3x_M7o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:27:25 -0000

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:45:27AM -0400, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> I've just had other obligations, although the one time I was on it was
> great.  It may be useful to have regular meetup times where people know to
> go and chat throughout the year.  Maybe weekly and targeted at time zone
> convenient/changing times.

+1

Also, maybe we need scheduled hallway meetups during other weeks as
well, because if one's TZ offset to the meeting's is large enough, it's
just too difficult to spare 10 hours a day to the meeting and hallway
meetings.

When I've attended physical meetings, the workday goes from 8AM or so
(breakfast, 9AM meetings) to around 11PM or midnight even (dinner,
"dinner BoFs", "bar BoFs", hallway meetings, catching up with $WORK,
etc.).  That's a 16 hour day considering that even just social events
(eg lunch) generally involve work in some fashion.  There's no way to do
10 of 16 hours on an 8 hour TZ phase difference.

We might want to consider spreadign remote-only meetings over two weeks
instead of one.

Nico
--