Re: Quality of Directorate reviews
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Fri, 29 November 2019 18:30 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39769120828 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:30:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CEN_udItxbo7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3020B1208AB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id o12so26760559oic.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:30:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=msz+YCPs9l6eBYIFDW/S4oaPKJd78KPIFdTG4KAX7PM=; b=q0xo7ep45a1TKbm9jkSHSFt4ccOZXvS4YtvyoJpj/WVRaKxbYulLAyzgEpr0V4ogAY WZfR8Cl0LzpgU3vNTshNhSCIy4cfQNAQcEYcSlDaahREUqJma/29u25v//U0mtFikBYb eNGAdm+1V9TZiq/Z6Bn1ylkFBpZ/FUTYNDnI3Ti+p3NyZ33Om5i6lQSu9t2BlYN3EP4d MIrNrxTikQa7p8I4UUBcTiAL7X8JFrnMQcfyfRWTkl5aYEbFw0XrK09W6ou6K0SJQqL0 GnXnFansArv2meqB+MecSHiyXCjW3TGbtC2ArdEeUF/tdcKxqmD0YXG/UamGNRcdi7/q NYrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=msz+YCPs9l6eBYIFDW/S4oaPKJd78KPIFdTG4KAX7PM=; b=XKTo2jANjpKrCzqx11r0h8lMB795RriUn4FGCd8c6ScXDRLgZORR9mAqLAdPiHroqV ERy0snVceJdEilPMr7n/Ylv75GlXxkQyD4F6vmBMPm+bLOxdPAXx7cOvD3ytnhIiM6F/ sBzzsaDMP8Fa9eev4zIZ392oUFJTeWg2KrWoDD7cOXPYZFkPmcirlJrt+74AY3gyWLq/ JPteW8441tD2CCLaEiLx2wfou8R5tC/1+tV9Bsg58dIalLnCuFUiQZ2EoxwV0OmIycOs ao8Cwub8GO3HQq1uSe4mGqa7nT49VkqiKVcvpncG62cPa7Usb4NpE60ranA79u8DU1gV fHxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUMT8TnHb6XKD5LQWReEnaawLBMELtDyf5FYJ5qCMRIuN2GCN8l 3nh32UNrrITrT2htOEjWFY6tX7RkAilbZPttTRI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwL8yREplHhp7OIlDwsRKYfw4hKcceSnLSfCMDDNc78ztesSCvMZTUc1/ulyrZkKVNm89+WPTiz8E23jvcmH5g=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:4011:: with SMTP id x17mr1207983oie.52.1575052237397; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:30:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 20:30:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89At83GGr8pUb8QfEvaeXN8qQ=XmjtJt5QeDcYm96fPUg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Quality of Directorate reviews
To: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, rwilton@cisco.com
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001ce1c60598806d51"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5kYWrK7UZ-Cn6CLcgR34JJPXF70>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:30:40 -0000
Hi Alex and Ralph, The quality will never increase if authors are not answering positively to discussions in their WG, however, I always blame first WG-authors and second WG chair and then thirdly the AD, for low quality of discussions/drafts/works. > From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>>; On Behalf Of Ralph Droms > Sent: 06 November 2019 11:03 > To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>>; > Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>>;; ietf <ietf@ietf.org> <ietf@ietf.org>>; > Subject: Re: Quality of Directorate reviews > > > > > On Nov 6, 2019, at 5:34 AM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>>; > wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > On 05/11/2019 21:50, Michael Richardson wrote: > >> > >> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>; wrote: > >>> If we want the IESG job to be more reasonably sized, we have to take > >>> work away from the ADs. I agree >>>>As far as I can see, that means taking away > >>> their duty of acting as final reviewers. I don't want to name names > >>> because I don't think the ADs are to be blamed individually, but > >>> some of them spend *enormous* effort on detailed reviews. The WG Chair/manager is blamed, they need to encourage discussions/works and deep investigation before submitting drafts to AD. The WG Chair should push WG and authors for best reviews and cooperation. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> I think that there is a lack of trust by ADs of the various > directorates. > > > > Other ADs have commented on this, but I think I need to repeat what > > they said and expand on it. > > > > Results are vary varied. Some are quite good (e.g. Gen-Art) and others > > really depend on reviewer. ADs responsible for Directorates are faces > > with the choice of firing half of their Directorates (which has some > > rather unfortunate consequences) and/or raise the bar on who should be > > allowed to join. We already struggle to recruit people at all levels > > of our organization. It is easy to know when the draft is ready, YOU just check if there was many discussions on the WG list, if non then send it back to WG to work. > > > > Best Regards, > > Alexey > > We shouldn't be depending on last-minute quality checks to maintain the > quality of our output. Agree >Working groups should be producing documents that > are ready to publish, and develop trust that their documents are high > quality. Agree, the authors need to answer all questions on the list as if all participants are ADs. WG authors reply differently with AD than with WG participant, this needs to change. AB
- NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback NomCom Chair 2019
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stewart Bryant
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Paul Wouters
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Livingood, Jason
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Randy Bush
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Yoav Nir
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stephen Farrell
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stephen Farrell
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Tim Wicinski
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Rob Sayre
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Bob Hinden
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Donald Eastlake
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John Levine
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Stewart Bryant
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Michael Richardson
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Kyle Rose
- AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Communi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Mark Nottingham
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Rob Sayre
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Terry Manderson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Quality of Directorate reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- RE: Quality of Directorate reviews Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- RE: Quality of Directorate reviews Paul Wouters
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Carsten Bormann
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Ralph Droms
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Salz, Rich
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Bob Hinden
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Jared Mauch
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Salz, Rich
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Leif Johansson
- Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate re… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Leif Johansson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… tom petch
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Stewart Bryant
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Salz, Rich
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Nico Williams
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Christian Huitema
- Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: Thou… Jari Arkko
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Eliot Lear
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Ole Troan
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Salz, Rich
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Bob Hinden
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Keith Moore
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John Leslie
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Michael Richardson
- Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Com… Keith Moore
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback Mary B
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Carsten Bormann
- Re: Author and attendance measurements [Was: Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Julian Reschke
- Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorat… Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Keith Moore
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Michael Richardson
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Quality of Directorate reviews Mark Nottingham