Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 09 August 2016 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F029F12D7FE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.253
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBOQwMTS4pZN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (ec2-52-9-186-167.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com [52.9.186.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7CB12D5AE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92725239C5; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A3gsos_7aFK3; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-24-61-15-184.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.61.15.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: hartmans-laptop) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 2D4A8841D7; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:22:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt
References: <147077254472.30640.13738163813175851232.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLHx7ytgZqZ9zQXA3vVSU-pNggQQs+QiDnzQ4tBEH5VAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMC_hb_BWM5iEpvaWBQY_QsDBZcJDGC9WdcD_O+KHX=64g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:22:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMC_hb_BWM5iEpvaWBQY_QsDBZcJDGC9WdcD_O+KHX=64g@mail.gmail.com> (Ted Hardie's message of "Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:34:58 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslmvklk571.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6K7mqdllwx9xbUPIc0phvrsFnr4>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 21:23:06 -0000

>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> writes:

    Ted>    Hi Barry, Do screen readers and other assistive technologies
    Ted> differentiate between lower case and upper case appropriately
    Ted> and consistently?  When I try a basic screen reader (the one
    Ted> that came with my Ubuntu distro), it doesn't seem to make a
    Ted> distinction, but this may be misconfiguration on my part (I
    Ted> don't use it in general).  regards, Ted

I have not found this to be an issue.  In general, I don't distinguish
between caps in running text, but all the screen readers I've used
(including even the one on Android) can distinguish caps if you ask them
too.

In the specific case of Orca, the Ubuntu screen reader you're probably
looking at, you have a couple of options.  You can go into the voice tab
on preferences and set up a different caps voice from the normal voice.
What I tend to do though is simply use  the spell word feature when I
think it's ambiguous; that will include caps in spelling.


In several years of participating in the IETF I've had relatively little
confusion reading RFCs whether keywords were intended to be all caps.
Sometimes I do have to check, but I've found that to be
sufficient--sufficiently so that I've had neither a desire to complain
about the ambiguity nor to turn on explicit caps notification all the
time on the screen readers that support it.

Others may have different experience.