Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AA121F8C20 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eibbFCOOQYVk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A321A21F8C4F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1318573152; x=1350109152; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4E97D434.8030402@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Fr i,=2014=20Oct=202011=2001:18:28=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Barry=20Leiba=20<barryleiba@co mputer.org>|CC:=20"J.D.=20Falk"=20<jdfalk-lists@cybernoth ing.org>,=20"ietf@ietf.org"=0D=0A=09<ietf@ietf.org> |Subject:=20Re:=20Last=20Call:=20<draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfbl bcp-02.txt>=20(Complaint=09Feedback=0D=0A=20Loop=20Operat ional=20Recommendations)=20to=20Informational=20RFC |References:=20<20110922134311.28658.88510.idtracker@ietf a.amsl.com>=09<6.2.5.6.2.20111003005127.09464a50@resistor .net>=09<F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C45D9E13@EXCH- C2.corp.cloudmark.com>=09<CAC4RtVAyyPKjxPqKQKnc5qeFh-88KO T7NL0846gRTMOb9zL0rg@mail.gmail.com>=09<3266F4FF-761B-4A1 2-8F68-7F7F8EBC3090@cybernothing.org>=20<CALaySJJGwGparJZ VxnTZUWZfU+RyVUcVfg13GPmdvr+4VAzZ5A@mail.gmail.com> |In-Reply-To:=20<CALaySJJGwGparJZVxnTZUWZfU+RyVUcVfg13GPm dvr+4VAzZ5A@mail.gmail.com>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B =20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|X-Originating-IP:=20[1 72.30.48.1]; bh=Md0Ae6xnVlyV6pqOW3yNtAvu3wjLB3KmzjDQqonaN9c=; b=nn5SkOHBSojv1PyNZwejM1ouH+/jHEkNRsim8tBua+1S33B8LW2d6t6J r6wcFC1R9G6f5WivAf1jj6CuO47MQ3VSl9wj7/hJ1bam4Xi7CmkxUrXui 50BqakqdQe/trcuZuJjIkGLScJGtX2ICEGZ7UMRUqhZeSoe/c7w1SydaQ M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6498"; a="127638971"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2011 23:19:11 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,343,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="163975612"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 13 Oct 2011 23:19:11 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:18:32 -0700
Message-ID: <4E97D434.8030402@qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:18:28 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC
References: <20110922134311.28658.88510.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20111003005127.09464a50@resistor.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C45D9E13@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAC4RtVAyyPKjxPqKQKnc5qeFh-88KOT7NL0846gRTMOb9zL0rg@mail.gmail.com> <3266F4FF-761B-4A12-8F68-7F7F8EBC3090@cybernothing.org> <CALaySJJGwGparJZVxnTZUWZfU+RyVUcVfg13GPmdvr+4VAzZ5A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJGwGparJZVxnTZUWZfU+RyVUcVfg13GPmdvr+4VAzZ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 06:19:13 -0000

On 10/4/11 12:51 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>> He's not talking about the filename; the short title is what's printed
>>> at the top of every page.  It comes from the "abbrev" parameter in the
>>> "title" element in the XML.  It can be changed with an RFC Editor
>>> note.
>>>        
>> I'm certain MAAWG won't object to that change.  Do I need to send the note?
>>      
> No; the sponsoring AD will enter the RFC Editor note in the tracker.
> You can change it in your XML, and if there are other changes that
> require a revised I-D it'll get picked up then.  Otherwise, the RFC
> Editor will fix it before AUTH48.
>    

The sponsoring AD would like to know what is desired in the RFC Editor 
note: What would you like the short title to be? "CFBL Recommendations"? 
That said, I'm happy to have you fix it with other items (such as 
s/codify/document, etc.) as such come up.

As for the "About MAAWG": Personally, I think it would be better to put 
the paragraph in the Acknowledgments section, or it could be simply put 
as a paragraph in the References section under reference [1]. I find the 
Last Call discussion pretty convincing that this text is untoward in the 
Abstract.

Unlike Eliot, I am not as worried about substantive content complaints. 
These are recommendations from MAAWG, and they are being published as an 
informational, non-consensus document so that a WG can refer to the 
document. Such a WG may agree with all of the recommendations, but more 
likely will have some alternative advice when referring to this 
document. I'll certainly discuss with the IESG whether an IESG note 
explaining this is necessary, but I think the standard template ("This 
document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is 
published for informational purposes. It has been approved for 
publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).") is 
probably sufficient.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102