IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221E321F8CC7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.385
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.385 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.814, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qpTVdNDjE7t0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8701621F8B9D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77481 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2011 18:28:47 -0000
Received: from gal.iecc.com (64.57.183.53) by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2011 18:28:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 96825 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2011 18:28:47 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 14 Oct 2011 18:28:47 -0000
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:28:25 -0000
Message-ID: <20111014182825.69811.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC
In-Reply-To: <CAHhFybpBaUQVTUzG=DQo9Oo6Z7mAWMfJN0n2e7WKWNfDwDW+KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:28:50 -0000

>I'd still prefer s/the largest/a/ or s/the largest/a large/ or similar.

This makes no sense. you believe that there is another large
organization that does what MAAWG does?

>Others asked about the "non-derivative" blurb, and maybe I missed the
>answer for these questions.  What is the idea?

That's the normal language for for RFCs that reproduce other
organizations' documents.  There's nothing unusual about it.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email