IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC

Hector <sant9442@gmail.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sant9442@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C897F21F8B15 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.199, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PuiZqHnmxXN1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A3121F8B70 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so1711517ywm.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sWksqNITzF0bTu3V1GVhdADVujJfwC1pyS+8nHneKac=; b=U2PtO68qI45sKa1d8khyJLN+oG0R/SfE5Dw1B9YC9DCgeJr2By+435gk6E2gwO3Edr fSVmRTjyAnR9H1Nnm6sTDa0FFFkwEUFMjD3vQ7erBm2CS4NVmfq6nJOsUZjQAbPPF7lP K5vCPncUGKYnDMUanl7I9pP/TEZGQutW05x/w=
Received: by 10.236.144.136 with SMTP id n8mr12725468yhj.12.1317809477602; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adsl-215-50-126.mia.bellsouth.net (99-3-147-93.lightspeed.miamfl.sbcglobal.net. [99.3.147.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w70sm1660624yhk.6.2011.10.05.03.11.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E8C2D35.4060005@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:11:01 -0400
From: Hector <sant9442@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC
References: <20110922134311.28658.88510.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20111003005127.09464a50@resistor.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C45D9E13@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAC4RtVAyyPKjxPqKQKnc5qeFh-88KOT7NL0846gRTMOb9zL0rg@mail.gmail.com> <3266F4FF-761B-4A12-8F68-7F7F8EBC3090@cybernothing.org> <4E8BA37F.9010303@mail-abuse.org> <4E8BFC76.8040706@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E8BFC76.8040706@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:08:10 -0000

Eliot Lear wrote:
> For the record, I tend to dislike pollution of the RFC series with PR
> blurbs as well.  This having been said, I would be far more interested
> in a discussion about the actual substantive content of the document.
> 
> Eliot

+1, the real problem is that once this door is cracked open then we 
begin to see more of it and that what we really don't wish to be 
dealing with.

--
HLS

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email