Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC

[SM <[e-mail]>]

Hi John,
At 13:18 05-10-2011, John Levine wrote:
>Since J.D. happens to be on the relevant MAAWG committee, he could
>probably get approval to make minor changes, e.g., move the MAAWG
>blurb to the end, but I would rather the IETF stop nitpicking and just
>publish it.  It's a reasonable discussion of a relevant topic on which
>MAAWG has more expertise than the IETF.

It's up to the RFC Editor to decide whether the blurb is appropriate.

>RFCs 5564, 5728, 5830, 5831, and 5832, all are republished and have
>no-derivative notices, so this wouldn't be particularly new or
>unusual.

RFC 5564 is an Independent Submission.  RFC 5728 describes the MIB 
module for DVB-RCS.  RFC 5830, RFC 5831 and RFC 5832 are Independent 
Submissions about GOST.  For what it is worth, these three RFCs are 
about Russian Federal standards.  As for MIBs, they are considered as 
Code components.

Regards,
-sm