IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5359621F8B24 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.279, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pj-QOvz3Y0Fc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B7D21F869E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so2701609wwf.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OAGOpJMykwVgTSl4Ry4vDeW+SEN5sDTVK4elx45UCZg=; b=NSt+BcnpVbozZ0lt7chAyfoF714h0o54e/tNRVs48TcBdip+aD7p9t8KX+rqY7HaSH 44TkNmWyTC7ektBc++O4oRNyDl9CBopdsnyhpWCROFez+lUXjGPrGMkODwS8ODHz5Byr X8zLfHSqdT6B5QN0QXTBDE497oGKJnP5xT8eE=
Received: by 10.227.170.68 with SMTP id c4mr1004656wbz.62.1318618380153; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.80.134 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111014182825.69811.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <CAHhFybpBaUQVTUzG=DQo9Oo6Z7mAWMfJN0n2e7WKWNfDwDW+KQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111014182825.69811.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:52:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybpbd2MeNko1owE362QFOHqqX9adzDnHGtRz5HzkN8ZP7A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:53:05 -0000

On 14 October 2011 20:28, John Levine wrote:

Hi John,

> you believe that there is another large organization that
> does what MAAWG does?

For "largest" I'd have to *know* that there's nothing else,
and that is not the case, e.g., I can't say what ECO does,
what folks in AP-regions do, and if they are already MAAWG
members or not.

I'd trust you if you'd say that the ASRG is no part of this
picture.

Too lazy to look in the member list for "missing pieces",
 Frank

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email