IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE6721F8D3F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.968
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.968 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7NvBzestGcNx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3450821F8D3B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyh21 with SMTP id 21so2343406wyh.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HBal2gHjcvhQBEvLixNkpnNq9VT0U64+RClPTKfQrxA=; b=lagKKjNEPWW358HLyXgIjG3/4vCvycnNJ74aCXeocSSPjFFt799L5rbyoDmVsohMEd H0Plqfujk8GmANmtfQ+IwXI5euxoPEQOiOlAKrFOr2MksFOy9SMXVL4uP3OFm0iFfgFC A2Un414KqKVLpRx09vBJwmaT7E7e8vXZAyyIc=
Received: by 10.227.11.81 with SMTP id s17mr53224wbs.62.1317840785218; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.80.134 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E8C85C0.5030003@tana.it>
References: <20110922134311.28658.88510.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20111003005127.09464a50@resistor.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C45D9E13@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAC4RtVAyyPKjxPqKQKnc5qeFh-88KOT7NL0846gRTMOb9zL0rg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHhFybrN8t5iKCtb-qYNsaLfnpHVnhzDVxh5iOET=QjOdWLkmg@mail.gmail.com> <4E8C85C0.5030003@tana.it>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:52:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybr8Qy6YhREiK=j33WMgDtPFmdh_o3iUwbxUXjhScP_jqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:49:58 -0000

On 5 October 2011 18:28, Alessandro Vesely wrote:

Hi,

> maybe also s/Spam/spam/, since we're at it

I vaguely recall that "Spam" vs. "spam" used to be an intentional
difference in Usenet *.abuse.* newsgroups:  One variant was for
"SPiced hAM", and the other form was for "UBE" (unsolicited bulk
e-mail) or the original "Netnews Spam".  Therefore I guess it is
no typo in the draft.

-Frank

P.S.: <URL:https://duckduckgo.com/lite/?q=Monty+Python+Spam>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email