Re: IETF Chair
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 14 October 2020 20:13 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBC13A1033 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id epylA62Bhy9Y for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f177.google.com (mail-yb1-f177.google.com [209.85.219.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B28DD3A102F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f177.google.com with SMTP id a4so296877ybq.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+ZP1qTKiNwb+p0CvLm83c/fnUOfY2fk4/T5Cd7HcXOo=; b=W0iXXE7KSkU+Nq662JniPpicousmJOYNu2kA7RM22H7xjAES6xu09IRzwcSy+qQzwC XO6z07hDYbJxoV+F7LIeSas+1y37TY56ptXA/HyMFZ/bYJ1s1bLwbbWciMyi44Rd7Axz 0KU1G6WZjgxKIztXvs3XikJnyBKHuRfKCZl4c3NaUn2MpivX3QPZUpF0R6dV8gIfkw4a /JA1m1aD4SSLbLdsfAAdj/VY1cFVwhBKDh8HwbEV+ZuhfPBvddpccbV/HzD3bydJUfU9 L9yXd+dRpL+5uJvy5gfp5l8ulCZAkfKzMg+ERkTSf1KmTINYYVKKSKn5tzuenxF/5LBG oN0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+n1OEyPL60qw/olsDGltiRQ7tJGIZiqS+KJvFyvGCdYwr1pKC vU1HUQallnxGKpHGIfc8kMPsYaWyNloD9p+bC34=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxheJF8lx5/UMSPPA5DXozcUjRWaH8RRGCnVB6K2bm6KasRANnl7v+NUkxiOgWQGlZpg6Xe+IhZBmTCJy2jsnU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:6c3:: with SMTP id m3mr643238ybt.273.1602706396793; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2B51679C-2BED-4F7B-B146-FF1524B00AA5@akamai.com> <C775E80B-9A31-492E-BA6A-96F9FE831316@akamai.com> <128277543.164613.1602611739735@email.ionos.com> <CAMm+LwjCGVUuFXK+fAzpV176hseXB9iLzC-7OZQZf=ca9+3x0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBsuiQCr3AKUjuHERpVEAviiFMXnEqZ0qa5jUnWK+zjfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBsuiQCr3AKUjuHERpVEAviiFMXnEqZ0qa5jUnWK+zjfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:13:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgWLfZjs6p9q30dEk_EWHFREh8N_382NyU9DdyWgR9waQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Chair
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075cf5405b1a72980"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9yp1FGoW03vj4s8ojKxL1nxxwOU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:13:19 -0000
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 3:16 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > > But 90% of the efforts of the academy and 99% of those of commerce are > focused on > > the Blockchain, an integrity technology. > > It's worse than that, because not only is most of the effort placed on > blockchain technology, blockchain technology is also being pushed as > the answer to *everything*. Blockchain technology has a place, but it > doesn't make sense everywhere, and when one says, "Wait, let's take a > step back and look at what we really *need* blockchains for, and where > we don't," then one seems a heretic... or at best, quaintly naïve. > > Barry > And it's even worse because Blockchain is not just a technology, it is an ideology. What is useful in Blockchain is the technology patented by Haber and Stornetta in 1990. Extending one way functions to create one way sequences is very powerful. We use that in Certificate Transparency. The idea of using a one way sequence to anchor a naming system is very powerful and should have been the basis for the RPKI (nobody wanted to listen). But when people propose taking their problem and jamming it into Blockchain, they are inheriting a whole bunch of legacy that really isn't helpful. It is pretty easy to guess who Satoshi was and he knew he was dying when he launched the scheme. He was a man in a very big hurry and he was not designing a platform for the ages. BitCoin and the other cryptocurrencies are currently consuming roughly 1% of global energy use. The amount of electronic commerce taking place on BitCoin in goods other than other crypto currencies is still a rounding error. A lot of people are getting rich from what regularly turn out to have been Ponzi schemes. I am not hitching my wagon to Blockchain because it is the regulatory equivalent of a kick me technology. A practical model for ubiquitous end to end security is enough of a political liability without building on a platform whose only constituencies are drug peddlers, child abusers and money launderers. Terrorists already know how to obtain end to end encryption products that meet their needs, I do not know of any technology that would prevent terrorists using existing end-to-end encryption schemes. But I do know how to shut down the cryptocurrency world.
- IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF Chair Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Chair Sarah Banks
- Re: IETF Chair Carsten Bormann
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Kyle Rose
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Kyle Rose
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Carsten Bormann
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Mezgani Ali
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: IETF Chair Leif Johansson
- Data at rest (was Re: IETF Chair) Robert Sparks
- Connections, and timing (was: IETF chair) Keith Moore
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Barry Leiba
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: blockchain, not IETF Chair John Levine
- Re: IETF Chair Michael Thomas
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: IETF Chair Stephen Farrell
- Blockchain is alchemy Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Connections, and timing (was: IETF chair) Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: IETF Chair Ben Laurie
- Re: IETF Chair Larry Masinter
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney