Re: IETF Chair

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 14 October 2020 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBC13A1033 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id epylA62Bhy9Y for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f177.google.com (mail-yb1-f177.google.com [209.85.219.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B28DD3A102F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f177.google.com with SMTP id a4so296877ybq.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+ZP1qTKiNwb+p0CvLm83c/fnUOfY2fk4/T5Cd7HcXOo=; b=W0iXXE7KSkU+Nq662JniPpicousmJOYNu2kA7RM22H7xjAES6xu09IRzwcSy+qQzwC XO6z07hDYbJxoV+F7LIeSas+1y37TY56ptXA/HyMFZ/bYJ1s1bLwbbWciMyi44Rd7Axz 0KU1G6WZjgxKIztXvs3XikJnyBKHuRfKCZl4c3NaUn2MpivX3QPZUpF0R6dV8gIfkw4a /JA1m1aD4SSLbLdsfAAdj/VY1cFVwhBKDh8HwbEV+ZuhfPBvddpccbV/HzD3bydJUfU9 L9yXd+dRpL+5uJvy5gfp5l8ulCZAkfKzMg+ERkTSf1KmTINYYVKKSKn5tzuenxF/5LBG oN0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+n1OEyPL60qw/olsDGltiRQ7tJGIZiqS+KJvFyvGCdYwr1pKC vU1HUQallnxGKpHGIfc8kMPsYaWyNloD9p+bC34=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxheJF8lx5/UMSPPA5DXozcUjRWaH8RRGCnVB6K2bm6KasRANnl7v+NUkxiOgWQGlZpg6Xe+IhZBmTCJy2jsnU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:6c3:: with SMTP id m3mr643238ybt.273.1602706396793; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2B51679C-2BED-4F7B-B146-FF1524B00AA5@akamai.com> <C775E80B-9A31-492E-BA6A-96F9FE831316@akamai.com> <128277543.164613.1602611739735@email.ionos.com> <CAMm+LwjCGVUuFXK+fAzpV176hseXB9iLzC-7OZQZf=ca9+3x0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBsuiQCr3AKUjuHERpVEAviiFMXnEqZ0qa5jUnWK+zjfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBsuiQCr3AKUjuHERpVEAviiFMXnEqZ0qa5jUnWK+zjfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:13:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgWLfZjs6p9q30dEk_EWHFREh8N_382NyU9DdyWgR9waQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Chair
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075cf5405b1a72980"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9yp1FGoW03vj4s8ojKxL1nxxwOU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:13:19 -0000

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 3:16 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> > But 90% of the efforts of the academy and 99% of those of commerce are
> focused on
> > the Blockchain, an integrity technology.
>
> It's worse than that, because not only is most of the effort placed on
> blockchain technology, blockchain technology is also being pushed as
> the answer to *everything*.  Blockchain technology has a place, but it
> doesn't make sense everywhere, and when one says, "Wait, let's take a
> step back and look at what we really *need* blockchains for, and where
> we don't," then one seems a heretic... or at best, quaintly naïve.
>
> Barry
>

And it's even worse because Blockchain is not just a technology, it is an
ideology.

What is useful in Blockchain is the technology patented by Haber and
Stornetta in 1990. Extending one way functions to create one way sequences
is very powerful. We use that in Certificate Transparency. The idea of
using a one way sequence to anchor a naming system is very powerful and
should have been the basis for the RPKI (nobody wanted to listen).

But when people propose taking their problem and jamming it into
Blockchain, they are inheriting a whole bunch of legacy that really isn't
helpful. It is pretty easy to guess who Satoshi was and he knew he was
dying when he launched the scheme. He was a man in a very big hurry and he
was not designing a platform for the ages. BitCoin and the other
cryptocurrencies are currently consuming roughly 1% of global energy use.
The amount of electronic commerce taking place on BitCoin in goods other
than other crypto currencies is still a rounding error. A lot of people are
getting rich from what regularly turn out to have been Ponzi schemes.

I am not hitching my wagon to Blockchain because it is the regulatory
equivalent of a kick me technology. A practical model for ubiquitous end to
end security is enough of a political liability without building on a
platform whose only constituencies are drug peddlers, child abusers and
money launderers. Terrorists already know how to obtain end to end
encryption products that meet their needs, I do not know of any technology
that would prevent terrorists using existing end-to-end encryption schemes.
But I do know how to shut down the cryptocurrency world.