Re: IETF Chair

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Wed, 14 October 2020 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04ECA3A0E05 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8zAusfZ5YRQ2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3CE3A0E03 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f29so3432421ljo.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=/PWUC+73NY5UcXWe31q111MZKARLF7XwFvl9tY1z8+o=; b=kdbbv/l4Yt1DnPMWCBGZ3z5hsZzEdBDQrsrUViymIk4ErYUqvHQ2g/ThSZ/uFuImmK fLx4RNJosXVhoMWymZvsBKidGUaGQxxqN1Zq7vXRRUKeEoXkHHdPR1hwFGcJKAFlamDY k0ecs82PziJSD2AWYdRLfpRMP6UVVyoJPOVa23QXtTT6Eo29xwb0rLbaUg9XvHsQcVzw YT7SlObi4nNEHYU/Rg7Ar+aMEq0OsrDIfzq8sqePdqqx+rPKqGnBL4RiF7GDV8jjME6m R+0a6lywaXE3v4YnKukT2NFfxG6Omn5jjVEYcDpUO0yTQwnsKfBAry6ZB/p7FQ0gJtco e4tQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=/PWUC+73NY5UcXWe31q111MZKARLF7XwFvl9tY1z8+o=; b=o3bWlY5x6q8hY9XvvGwoYfJ6xHrbAY0pAGg2OAwyWSW2Dy1rb+bTSVvanqkGwfrWVJ Rv6jSGAEVjdLSHNskE5ByM4iw2khDbgs1U072gUhGVPLVlhBQW8SPTqi9FlUxvE3MdyH Dz21r79Mny6yk00OUgH2cw3VdKyBXPXo994YaSTxUzGhSahNA/ZMt5ti5yM79zZTHauZ hQKkph5IuOVdAQ42+Er4dONtR9q7EAGrr64TRKA4xqq6rxVvOW2QYbr6Nk4Rv4Di1jBs enrGIhSYXWgD635drzoEUqs1ea7kYUaqCDN8Psa6/nMRFfiARDDyGF91zDcTlaKPqotJ S1xQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fALZob6vO7o3r1tg68fub0ZLkMmuVau390pGc20UU/ZPYEyOq om9Cf3kiy3Xp+Eqt6gd/vkUEjXVH1gWgCz+HkyI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQnN4C/wtG14UA+YfAy0kdooymJ5rxFPnRnl3JnvcifVV01ApwSX4AFLlDFwjWUDPacTYJZQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0fc:: with SMTP id h28mr2100221ljl.226.1602685688724; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.193] (h-82-196-111-160.NA.cust.bahnhof.se. [82.196.111.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x194sm1199792lfa.250.2020.10.14.07.28.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-3FCFCF02-3110-4782-B9D9-B9C4B403DD09"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: IETF Chair
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:28:04 +0200
Message-Id: <7169AFA0-4A01-48DE-82A8-AF308629C559@mnt.se>
References: <CAMm+LwiGPF-pNm8cPnf1aUrBw4BJ-THKVBGpcO8n_0gkv95B-A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiGPF-pNm8cPnf1aUrBw4BJ-THKVBGpcO8n_0gkv95B-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17H35)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IjydGKnx-sKKiF_w-irh1kj4yLc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:28:13 -0000


Skickat från min iPhone

> 14 okt. 2020 kl. 16:16 skrev Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>:
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 5:12 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> Historically, the people who put in the work "win" (bad word).
> 
> Historically, the people who have the right connections win.
> 

+1

> I proposed encrypting the client-resolver connection in DNS on multiple occasions for four years before the DPRIV BOF. Each time I was told, 'not interested, there is no need'.
> 
> Then suddenly people decided there was a need. A need so urgent that there had to be a solution in 12 months. So PHB's proposal which was designed to directly layer on UDP using a direct key exchange would take too long to complete. The solution (obviously) was to run the DNS protocol over TLS using the new TCP fast start to overcome the resulting latency issues. And of course this proposal was very popular with people who had worked on fast start because that would bring them rapid deployment because everyone wants DNS privacy.
> 
> Only they didn't. And now six years after the Honolulu BOF, I still can't actually use DPRIV to secure any of my systems because none of the platform or browsers providers support it or plan to do so.
> 
> And I am not the only person who keeps having this sort of thing happen. I am just the person who makes a point of continually reminding people of the failure in the hope the process might be different next time round. No it won't be. In fact it's happening again right now.
> 
> 
> People here were mighty upset when we started W3C and then the W3C folk got upset when some of us turned OASIS into what it is now. I don't like the business model of those organizations but they did get the work done.