IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Chair

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 13 October 2020 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5D43A08C3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2pisX94dXAPL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EBDA3A08C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09DKvDmm025611; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:00:00 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=r19boSQUDOkzKQprlXPljeGgSG+y4x58MU1hbO/GrOg=; b=jiVQgyK+VbR2hOxWQ9dyqYzD2/ycnk5U+HXD6HYQX+LkW8uHNXFlguWNsdxNPvlGxlcK iarg39eoq7ak6ENadfjQDtILHGwYADPW3GzjGoClwW1s4HoXq0NcKDFaG9oPPVUhXxK2 EtegOqnxKrKF+sEShUtdlITQLgVOmodtQ+m7/dpX6AcAi1e/kB1KxxyI6GWeNKnlPkCz Q3ARX3C/CKF8E6Jg/3v6zAyWNues1uwEtViAjhEMHskaCf7MXeDg3niK5S6GiMOgdJfi HW9tXQEB+UZpFm+t8iHL/DVHzSUBC9fK1cEPSR0xbCwogYpP9lfOW5HUSTaPGXe9pZFt IA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 3455k2wkgw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:59:59 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09DKoGwa029002; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:59:58 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 34389xpmd1-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:59:58 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:59:58 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:59:58 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF Chair
Thread-Topic: IETF Chair
Thread-Index: AQHWnBtY7Tsr2mnEo0mtyrtxMZCzfqmVt46AgABnaICAACcPgIAAAtCA///GjIA=
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:59:57 +0000
Message-ID: <B71015FD-1082-44E4-A904-3205CBE0D64B@akamai.com>
References: <2B51679C-2BED-4F7B-B146-FF1524B00AA5@akamai.com> <C775E80B-9A31-492E-BA6A-96F9FE831316@akamai.com> <128277543.164613.1602611739735@email.ionos.com> <FDB2D034-AC8C-46E6-9306-321D820EE297@tzi.org> <VI1P194MB02857F93C2F0604A52198E17AE040@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB02857F93C2F0604A52198E17AE040@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081201
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B7DCCA2F6DA3B947883344D67F389281@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-10-13_13:2020-10-13, 2020-10-13 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=762 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010130148
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-10-13_15:2020-10-13, 2020-10-13 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=713 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010130149
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.61) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint6
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/T_KAKft97IpR64sdBzXloeyyWOE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:00:03 -0000

> from my side, I'm waiting for an official decision regarding my proposals 4 years ago, I hope I won't wait more.

You do not have to wait.  There is no official decision.  If you want to write a document and present it to one of the "dispatch" working groups, you can get some opinions.

But you have already gotten several opinions. Most of the technical ones disagree, saying it won't work, if only because it is too hard to deploy. But you also got suggestions to find people who agree with you as a first step.  Have you done that?  Then start writing a document that people can comment on.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email