Re: IETF Chair
Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:35 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55913A410A; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:35:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXdx-m-wLnQr; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:35:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93313A305C; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus004 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MdvNi-1k3HfU3iKM-00b2dY; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:25:18 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:25:18 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1722570940.14078.1605115518536@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <128277543.164613.1602611739735@email.ionos.com>
References: <2B51679C-2BED-4F7B-B146-FF1524B00AA5@akamai.com> <C775E80B-9A31-492E-BA6A-96F9FE831316@akamai.com> <128277543.164613.1602611739735@email.ionos.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Chair
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:A9vV0G3t6RUrPMVK4rj6Z6PNfK5z8RsrIka6YW07YAaYYK0ojma tS77aMoXviS7c21nhYnKfbwbn93Uny6HRLNeaZNeF2tFL3OrDdW9ZYCnLqcmW8ZvLav1gpW l5ASj+iPqdhxObZeiAEYPOq0f/Z60UEu7lkXZQYJggTS2dATTmDAg2S3/bCbo4zbSKf6Srx y+TG66/dPdgJX1yhJQE5w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:yTaW58AJXSE=:mpRMVnHUQtWEo2tSQLQgle cbeDgOKPLlXeT7bLpd5f+uoxZtNv5t2pINDmYy2DtCKYXTGtM4UC39ouPJ+4JrJHEWwhmOvYY FIoKtG95U7/Oq5rSTVyGPgcBc44wqSU/qUg8ItJVOPmIVyIolN45jKJLmEgAoS2mg0SAn0HyF pMEvySOxxVjGRM6NdxdVPbkiF6FsGyEHujFiCpxka1a9huQbvUSjNOekDzcZLJ67eNuvfksK0 22vtJXTmVgAKD061YDivEELfs4tCr/iozLQ+uYqVbQsBbYB2dEgoj4rd/Kvbe9SFd+8uKX/X7 hscoUDyMDUXInGB8zkbfDncni8dDZYWmgMkPcGX5Of3BA2SlP+vIIP7tRZOT3mFBXleCAR45w mLND45dJaZdC+3E6Hb/OaP8pJ7/YNICtKH6BFsft3vzOw5nGoEUaRvAMxrgsa/APIcQiHYoNS EhWhdJdCcw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JpCfGM8JprSLIvuDL7JhOAPnx4E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:35:31 -0000
> On 10/13/2020 1:55 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote: > > > I think I like where you're going with this transparency Rich! To highlight, here are a couple zingers I found in your answers to the questionnaire: > > "Sadly, right now the IETF often looks more like a colonial empire than something like the UN." > > "Akamai gets indirect value were I to become the Chair." > > "I am not a professional standards person, I am an implementor who needs standards to succeed." > > "I bring an understanding of what it means to be a respectful and inclusive person, knowing that I am a privileged member of society." > > This last one is not a zinger but I wanted to include it because of its irony to me personally: “We need to make sure that anyone with an interesting idea for an Internet protocol will feel welcome to bring it forward, and continue to feel welcome even if their idea has already been considered and dropped.” > > > > >
- IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF Chair Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Chair Sarah Banks
- Re: IETF Chair Carsten Bormann
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Kyle Rose
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Kyle Rose
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Carsten Bormann
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Salz, Rich
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Mezgani Ali
- RE: IETF Chair Khaled Omar
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: IETF Chair Leif Johansson
- Data at rest (was Re: IETF Chair) Robert Sparks
- Connections, and timing (was: IETF chair) Keith Moore
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Barry Leiba
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: blockchain, not IETF Chair John Levine
- Re: IETF Chair Michael Thomas
- Re: IETF Chair Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF Chair Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: IETF Chair Stephen Farrell
- Blockchain is alchemy Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Connections, and timing (was: IETF chair) Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: IETF Chair Ben Laurie
- Re: IETF Chair Larry Masinter
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: IETF Chair Timothy Mcsweeney