IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IETF Chair

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Tue, 13 October 2020 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F923A10A4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xwBlxanta91T for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR06-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-vi1eur06olkn2015.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.17.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FDF33A1045 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EYCbaOzLC9JNybsUmvloPIqMRn2WURGCLscfya8V5zot4DJ80h7pS770Eoxv7ldPAd6XXMZuKvZ4zQWvwP4zXYC5u1xwR4caOlswKVarBzydxW98GdZX4bfUEF6Rah9NommJqb95Je6obgYdAfg/+ttyIVzYPiono6scdgMNrz3HWLPW1XtMccc1Onl8s3qNFk536bi1xd45nPjn+oPVwyo9INpFMqeOm3813yEChL4+vtcE/O3Qc/tQCV3ALw1PNJOVxI5VDEjyT4meAmRBhIXky6NtS3yhJhpCZCMnned8fWDKeaL+WEV6hFVSMGO2ZDp5rEMaVVir/68aR/zppA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DJT7gwlRduqrKWDZLHRL0pPRGvosaa0fyrUT5CfD93k=; b=IpSccKtJNBVv1CXOJxgXwx68td+zevMgbdiZH7goeuTlorV1j9c69EzNetPI35oIoyldu+KevK29zFnNl0akGjnPcQF/hF+RYa8x2dTRrABRem7t7FIdQnHl71n4alnRYTraUb2xkj3vlRpna9gBcwCrMQtn4hFL9avaqMPqpxewN04x9W4T+1YYEp3+/BrRCAZqq+Zyw0gBQfOPv5llSJu7On1DfhtSS7ViXb4a/RY6XSNkmotK3+xCCaEXUplp8i22N7iIvpU1iRDzikY45rrOusLm9K721VTOHSIbMfOEc02InC/QYmebA6DmZhbQtAjjYZ0/EEideLv7D1KSAw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DJT7gwlRduqrKWDZLHRL0pPRGvosaa0fyrUT5CfD93k=; b=qGv06Op+F0wAd2V60sLCDtFzkSmtnxXQSNL/yWRAtw/N9Jp8IC5aGZ4TIh3oPn3K0GJEI/10KmPcd8NKKhDEXwI221Owwoz9Q1xMnJanodbGYnug67SY+BEhlVNOefw13Pcqz5KC+OhgMEHbTGc69y9T9PnjBwihlt+ZPrXpbqcXIl/cGgVUJiU95BWCczAsMd/hUL4tz3d2TcALzKelY/i1e10/2BDwGkC8c/xS0t0seEDedfhdnsmhUujGRrz41xv+vunc5MXIwa9Pdm83T3rrE+dvL9n5jKGO94RnZi07b3FL8ivythA+LBqY1SCylqcBqS+cqqK6Kk0/j0WRXw==
Received: from VI1EUR06FT018.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc37::47) by VI1EUR06HT047.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc37::136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.23; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:13:53 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:fc37::47) by VI1EUR06FT018.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc37::215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.23 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:13:53 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8]) by VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3455.030; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:13:53 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
CC: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Subject: RE: IETF Chair
Thread-Topic: IETF Chair
Thread-Index: AQHWnBtY7Tsr2mnEo0mtyrtxMZCzfqmVt46AgAAkWoCAAAHKsIAADQYAgAAESwCAAAJ7IA==
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:13:53 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1P194MB02858640A11A86540BE64A8AAE040@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <2B51679C-2BED-4F7B-B146-FF1524B00AA5@akamai.com> <C775E80B-9A31-492E-BA6A-96F9FE831316@akamai.com> <128277543.164613.1602611739735@email.ionos.com> <VI1P194MB02852CA91495361C156A171CAE040@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAJU8_nUA83XLnHApU3_egQz8miP3KwuyKYhRAJLXZUK5tSiPLg@mail.gmail.com> <554941550.167894.1602615842105@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <554941550.167894.1602615842105@email.ionos.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:71121BE9AFCB7C1CAB5B0835EA5B79EFA9112AAEF3F2DF80567993BB82CDC8EF; UpperCasedChecksum:38DAD78FD8497D0E863F990B9D83CCE55D418C5242590320CCA6E36A7552DD03; SizeAsReceived:7173; Count:44
x-tmn: [shTgCEpMG93+kqsIIbMJIyL/Aoxof3xe]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cf3d2492-ab5f-4f57-701d-08d86fac1ff8
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1EUR06HT047:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: xEJw1YMriB7HT355K/bpbg0x2rBbJ12w2DQreqdnWN2PlB4t2R5mhR9GtKvXLM/NU8p91ItsUFhZbADw9TF+9Qy0BYOe9Aqnk89awdDfFp/W9d32xzUXhFA2Biq7FVkAhxeIb0PGtuRlKo9ttAVlz8exJbW6l5wKLOCFLXvb18LGzNN0QMxn35TtFfdeyns5+3ygW26j1J8j2tlsCVDPaA==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 3UZaS1h1h/e9HqHp4FH8RkxJd/fPVPF18CcQeU0C5NZnmoImVvtS5qgwVfLh1o7GVBiH9Hj//DtIzZCn+7l0rqmQO8JWScxh62HCbTBfO08AYM6283hcEcDxSusri4yM+FC7JPxjirT2aWXt1mshyg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_VI1P194MB02858640A11A86540BE64A8AAE040VI1P194MB0285EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VI1EUR06FT018.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cf3d2492-ab5f-4f57-701d-08d86fac1ff8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2020 19:13:53.3608 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1EUR06HT047
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5nMaTielKdkFFCd5YE4nvRD8phQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:13:57 -0000

>> Or maybe a better question is, shouldn't standards be made in a way that allows anyone to implement?  And if nobody is implementing something, can it still be considered a standard?

I agree with what you said if it is not a question.

Khaled Omar

From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 9:04 PM
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>; Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF Chair

Hi Kyle,

>Indeed, one of the critical functions of the IETF (and, really, any
>SDO) is to discriminate: between good and bad ideas, productive and
>unproductive uses of time, between work that advances our shared
>values and work that opposes it. You will not get much support for
>rubber stamping anyone's proposals regardless of merit.

Isn't there usually a distinction between the standard and the implementation?  For example, if a 2x4 is a standard for building stuff, should the 2x4 standard body care if you use it to build a villa or a dog house?  Or maybe a better question is, shouldn't standards be made in a way that allows anyone to implement?  And if nobody is implementing something, can it still be considered a standard?

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email