IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 06 May 1996 23:38 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03102; 6 May 96 19:38 EDT
Received: from [132.151.1.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03097; 6 May 96 19:38 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21140; 6 May 96 19:38 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03069; 6 May 96 19:37 EDT
Received: from [132.151.1.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03016; 6 May 96 19:35 EDT
Received: from rip.psg.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21075; 6 May 96 19:35 EDT
Received: by rip.psg.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0uGZo5-00083MC; Mon, 6 May 96 16:35 PDT
Message-Id: <m0uGZo5-00083MC@rip.psg.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 16:35:00 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt
References: <595.831420942@munnari.OZ.AU> <199605062255.AA27074@zed.isi.edu>
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.

> I'm not sure that the list are all as interested as some of you are.
>
> Please send the updates/questions/flamage to the author(s) and other,
> specific individuals that you think might have an interest. No real
> use spaming the list eh?

Until the still unresolved, and it appears not well understood, problem of
specifying particular implementations as opposed to desired behavior has
been resolved, this would seem to be an issue sufficiently generic to the
specification process to interest much of the IETF.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email