Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt

bmanning@isi.edu Sat, 04 May 1996 20:36 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19052; 4 May 96 16:36 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19043; 4 May 96 16:36 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11586; 4 May 96 16:36 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19030; 4 May 96 16:36 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18989; 4 May 96 16:34 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11557; 4 May 96 16:34 EDT
Received: from zed.isi.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-23) id <AA29053>; Sat, 4 May 1996 13:34:12 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: bmanning@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605042034.AA25498@zed.isi.edu>
Received: by zed.isi.edu (5.65c/4.0.3-4) id <AA25498>; Sat, 4 May 1996 13:34:10 -0700
Subject: Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 04 May 1996 13:34:10 -0700
Cc: bmanning@isi.edu, ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-Reply-To: <m0uFnaC-00082tC@rip.psg.com> from "Randy Bush" at May 4, 96 01:05:00 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 373
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.

> > 	It is not current practice.  It is proposing a practice.
> 
> It is proposing overly restrictive and unrealistic practice.
> randy
> 

	I think that this is the gist of your concern. If so, it was 
	better stated and handled by Robert and based on his constructive
	comments, the draft is being updated.

	Have I missed any substantive issue in the flameage?
	
--bill