Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 04 May 1996 20:07 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18629; 4 May 96 16:07 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18624; 4 May 96 16:07 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11233; 4 May 96 16:07 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18608; 4 May 96 16:07 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18565; 4 May 96 16:05 EDT
Received: from rip.psg.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11208; 4 May 96 16:05 EDT
Received: by rip.psg.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0uFnaC-00082tC; Sat, 4 May 96 13:05 PDT
Message-Id: <m0uFnaC-00082tC@rip.psg.com>
Date: Sat, 04 May 1996 13:05:00 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: bmanning@isi.edu
Cc: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt
References: <m0uFmT9-00082tC@rip.psg.com> <199605041956.AA25255@zed.isi.edu>
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
>>> 4. Singly homed (only one interface). >>> Name service should always answer out the same interface as requests >>> come in on. Also, delegations will usually list a single A RR, so there >>> should only be a single canonical name. >> One presumes that the nameserver software will handle this properly, and I >> should not be restricted by how many interfaces my host has. > Assuming facts not in evidence. Then fix the software. > Thanks for your inputs. Perhaps since 85% of the world has zero > need for or near term interest in DS3 or 100Mb services that no > one else should work on these issues or publish documents on problems > or concerns with these issues. Not at all. But they should not arrogantly be mandated by an RFC. > It is not current practice. It is proposing a practice. It is proposing overly restrictive and unrealistic practice to be supervised by an unspecified new technocracy. randy
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Randy Bush
- draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Randy Bush
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt bmanning
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Randy Bush
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Robert Elz
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt bmanning
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Randy Bush
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Einar Stefferud
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Paul A Vixie
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Brett Watson
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Steve Goldstein
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt bmanning
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Einar Stefferud
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt John C Klensin
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Randy Bush
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt John C Klensin
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Robert Elz
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Robert Elz
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Andrew Partan
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt bmanning
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt bmanning
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Randy Bush
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt bmanning
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Randy Bush
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt Wolfgang Henke
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt John Curran
- Re: draft-manning-dnssvr-criteria-01.txt John Curran