Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard

Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Tue, 18 November 2014 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493CE1A1AB3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:12:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dNN0j-hMG00E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.maclaboratory.net (mail.maclaboratory.net [209.190.215.232]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614F51A1B03 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:12:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Footer: Y2R0Lm9yZw==
Received: from hypochilid-2.local ([199.119.118.21]) (authenticated user jhall@cdt.org) by mail.maclaboratory.net (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits)); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:12:30 -0500
Message-ID: <546B7DFE.2050407@cdt.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:12:30 -0500
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
References: <1416052605.74534.YahooMailIosMobile@web28902.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <91E3D29C-7AFC-4BEF-ABDC-021D7D1129CD@gmail.com> <5467A1D1.9030000@gmail.com> <CACweHNBwtuPbknTz25637htyuA-XJwx7=Tqn7GY8qm5f0_eZ8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACweHNBwtuPbknTz25637htyuA-XJwx7=Tqn7GY8qm5f0_eZ8w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KatIDx1VbvrOjqhCOtgC4I_eGd8
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-nottingham-safe-hint@tools.ietf.org" <draft-nottingham-safe-hint@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:12:38 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 11/15/14, 5:10 PM, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
> On 16/11/2014, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On 16/11/2014 07:34, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>> 
>>> Imagine Wikipedia with nothing controversial: nothing about
>>> abortions, religions, genetics, evolution…
>> 
>> And that will not happen, so Wikipedia will simply ignore "safe",
>> so browsers set to request "safe" will just get raw Wikipedia, so
>> "safe" will be useless for parents wishing to censor their
>> children's access to Wikipedia.
>> 
> 
> This straw man serves as a handy informative illustration.
> 
> Wikipedia doesn't (currently, or likely into the future) offer a
> 'safe' option.
> 
> Wikipedia doesn't offer a 'safe' option, so of course the hint
> isn't for them, so of course they will ignore it. Us standardising
> the preference doesn't suddenly force the entire web to present 
> safe/unsafe versions of everything.

But creating a standard may very well mean there will be a time where
they can't ignore it, and that concerns us. (this is the opposite of
the non-adoption of p3p and PICS, in a sense)

>> Thanks; this is a good illustration of why this whole thing is a
>> pointless fig leaf.
>> 
> 
> Once again, this hint is just a means of preempting the server's 
> question: "do you want safe mode?" The example that comes to mind
> is Google's 'safe search', which I presume is the naming
> phenotype.
> 
> If they don't ask the question, they can ignore the answer.
> 
> I wonder, again, if renaming it to "Prefer: x99-bob" would assuage 
> most peoples' concerns, at least had the renaming happened before 
> opinions were formed.

I don't think that would make a bit of difference. ::) It would
undoubtedly make it worse as people would use it for a myriad of other
bit expressions and then it would be essentially meaningless, but
standardized meaninglessness.

best, Joe

- -- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
1634 I ST NW STE 1100
Washington DC 20006-4011
(p) 202-407-8825
(f) 202-637-0968
joe@cdt.org
PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
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=KCKW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----