Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EFF1A8AE1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iC5hzZA9uNVt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99AA11A8AEB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1536; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414153583; x=1415363183; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=AU0RiCijNQsPgoGtPtvwl6OgPO8R7Au9YPbbEUkN+Qs=; b=mlHhh77ddTSSxVetZZBqTx/qCx0kslgpDVpGZvqnwrev3VPDKvQqfcBN Pnv1tEQq4PYUC1FiCxY5Ha1TvdVlZ5FtD31bPb5K6KTQuJpe2d+H8YiBx FofM/vPUdmao91zSlm93yfaJTHev5RJYehnHmSiZR52Q0vbr/crPQ11mK 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq8EAOdESlStJssW/2dsb2JhbABcg2JYgwbRcAKBIAF9hAIBAQEEI1UNBAsVAQIJFgQHAgIJAwIBAgFFBgEMBgIBAYg9tDCVAAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZkF+Cd4FUAQSUE4FQh3qBMYY7O44FgjSBRjsvgksBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,780,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="222557910"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 12:26:20 +0000
Received: from [10.61.108.74] (dhcp-10-61-108-74.cisco.com [10.61.108.74]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OCQKYB026494; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:26:20 GMT
Message-ID: <544A4572.3050908@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:26:26 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
References: <20141023140635.10188.qmail@ary.lan> <028201cfef81$44eaec60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <028201cfef81$44eaec60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RdwF3oSawdbk1oX9hcVsKO1aXWpC5aaDu"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XaQublM7nP6dafco3bHcqbkQLKg
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:26:25 -0000

On 10/24/14, 1:23 PM, t.p. wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
> To: <ietf@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:06 PM
>>>   This specification defines a "safe" preference for HTTP requests,
>>>   expressing a desire to avoid "objectionable" content.
>> I have read this draft and support its adoption.
> Me too.  It seems a straightforward step in the right direction for the
> Internet at large.   It is a small step but then taking small steps in
> the right direction is something that the IETF does rather well.

+1.

Eliot