Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 15 November 2014 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36891ACD48 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:08:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pZKq0ovyYPex for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8FC1ACD47 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:08:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id em10so666518wid.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:08:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eQNzsgOflLtBPhMsm1V+T2UxPqXsgud+aVWG4p0xsAk=; b=qYr5mHRHKOoqjUS6u380LaHE/CuMv0gzvSEeomNrnkW7MW8oR9ZxRV+cGs0UO1HLcD eKxBnwojvISfJeCVEFWO+pP7eR7nK+t3fw7I5R4rk1szFsPo60VNl4Bs8nanroAO7Ao9 +dZXOZ8m85GnJ0D2d+siOE1Drysrlsx9JDi/AqFSRhLkRsXckXrV3mE3ljttC/48rtji iXF0HEvehxfaW+QDaf00KcYG6CFarQAzu5n0OyTHtovGuGgJCI8EvOY7gp87b2ainER+ 8fYXoR/v39grhJBr8Ags87Wrl118Y17gir5yUg0yPThJojFMGqw0KTooDt0TAQrJKBBr FLpA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.14.226 with SMTP id s2mr17543738wic.61.1416074916594; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:08:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.76.134 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:08:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <01PE4IK2ZVO20028JO@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <20141023140635.10188.qmail@ary.lan> <028201cfef81$44eaec60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <01PE4IK2ZVO20028JO@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:08:36 -1000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbtCFefW82-676CsPuS7NX-Q6dE_=_qXAB7-T419VGzzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: "ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com" <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04138c9f610a010507e9a280"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oX28_7F_qWbG_TsHKBruINqNMcc
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:08:40 -0000

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:54 AM, <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com> wrote:

> I have also read the draft, and while I'm not entirely enthusiastic about
> the
> approach, it's quite clear this is going to happen regardless, and having a
> standardized mechanism for it strikes me as a far superior situation than
> having a bunch of nonstandard ways to do it deploy.
>
> I also find the objections to adopting it I've seen so far to be lacking
> foundation.
>
> I therefore support adoption of this draft.


Having read the entire thread up to here, including the last three posts
that I didn't understand, I think the above nicely sums up my position as
well.  Ship it.

-MSK