IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Fri, 26 August 2005 15:21 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8g1R-0005Jv-Jl; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:37 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8g1Q-0005Jq-IR for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26369 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ka.cs.utk.edu ([160.36.56.221]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8g24-0001qT-TW for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:22:20 -0400
Received: from localhost (ka [127.0.0.1]) by ka.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED982356D; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ka.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ka [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23438-04; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (user-119b1dm.biz.mindspring.com [66.149.133.182]) by ka.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535122356B; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <430F3362.5030601@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:06 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
References: <web-2951190@multicasttech.com>
In-Reply-To: <web-2951190@multicasttech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new with ClamAV and SpamAssasin at cs.utk.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, Bill Manning <bmanning@karoshi.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> I am perhaps just being slow and dim-witted after minor surgery, but why
> should a protocol that no-one will use be standards track ?

Why should we accept a few (mostly axe-grinding) peoples' assertions 
that no-one will use it?

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email