IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...)

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Thu, 01 September 2005 18:28 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EAtnB-0003md-Vw; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:28:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EAtn9-0003j4-MB for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:28:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19064 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:27:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 213-136-24-43.adsl.bit.nl ([213.136.24.43] helo=purgatory.unfix.org ident=postfix) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAtp5-0007Zj-Dg for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:30:05 -0400
Received: from firenze.zurich.ibm.com (pat.zurich.ibm.com [195.176.20.45]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by purgatory.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BA28733; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:27:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <8A8B241D9FAA21D02F463B3F@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA1096B57F@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.win deploy.n tdev.microsoft.com> <p06230956bf3bd9a4992d@[17.202.35.52]> <431676B7.5040302@cs.utk.edu> <B2C6F40E0409805428ED7669@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0509011352580.13347@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8A8B241D9FAA21D02F463B3F@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
Organization: Unfix
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:27:09 +0200
Message-Id: <1125599229.16485.89.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2047521401=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 20:08 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> The difference between LLMNR and mDNS here seems to be that mDNS *requires* 
> me to use two different names in the two different cases; LLMNR, while it 
> certainly *permits* me to do so, does not *require* it.

Can I read this as "LLMNR SHOULD be used with domains in the .local
domain" ? Which puts it really in the same baliwick as mDNS (that is the
version that existed before that draft was written with the name mdns ;)

One can of course easily remove the check for the .local from the real
mDNS and use it for anything else too. Just change the MUST into a
SHOULD in the draft and everybody is happy.

Greets,
 Jeroen


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email