IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Topic IPv6

"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu> Mon, 21 November 2016 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=713395049b=froomkin@law.miami.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C7912948F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:44:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3buiZTYqNG8s for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00028d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00028d01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D07129444 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0076638.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00028d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uALKdWNA022423; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:44:06 -0500
Received: from mail.miami.edu (umex016.cgcent.miami.edu [129.171.32.37]) by mx0a-00028d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26u2rq0hyy-8 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:44:06 -0500
Received: from post.law.miami.edu (129.171.187.242) by smtp2.cgcent.miami.edu (129.171.32.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:42:53 -0500
Received: from post.law.miami.edu (osaka.law.miami.edu [10.184.200.121]) by post.law.miami.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E24310077E; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:42:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:42:52 -0500
From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
Subject: RE: Topic IPv6
In-Reply-To: <04c201d24434$2329dd20$697d9760$@tndh.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1611211520170.27805@post.law.miami.edu>
References: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com> <20161121135800.hj773gvjquay7ka5@nic.fr> <CAGxDXJ_j+U2yngKPqK+ciHSG9B2CsTRYPq8swqbVZZBOfYB37Q@mail.gmail.com> <20161121145039.p56dd5cpczxaivyl@nic.fr> <CAGxDXJ_zAXt_QD8vpW29vShV1enXewQ1sshZfOQd+WMU17=DTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGxDXJ-Hkvfh=E_C8ReqBE-LoN+cRR9g5d=ZnusapoNSw3i8yQ@mail.gmail.com> <04c201d24434$2329dd20$697d9760$@tndh.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-21_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611210343
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RNl1UmWoTXe7ncOBRiKzscogI64>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, 'Alexander Nevalennyy' <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:44:09 -0000

On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Tony Hain wrote:

> The IETF has taken a position that its job is creating technologies and 
> that it is someone else's job to deal with the political implications of 
> those.
>


Is that now the rule?  Have RFCs 1984 & 2804 been superseded?

-- 
A. Michael Froomkin http://law.tm 305-284-4285 ssrn: bit.ly/1XlTJLz
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
Editor, Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like (Lots),  jotwell.com
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
                             It's warm here

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email