IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Topic IPv6

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD86012978C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:05:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPQGldrj_z8J for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C3C512944B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f82so1405189wmf.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:05:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UIFg+atB098Vw5O0riWbpK0bQpGBq9ZeXkTZStw6yHc=; b=UinmCFw2djGhbo+ndqPx+L4PH9GavSDy7sDaqYrS4vFFJhvjShIB/yOpl4cSyDdnT1 N34a0mJrodgqOJE2qr20F+vl3cnBWh7/SGAkactd4Y6pdvVm9Nc1t5j0TvgsdxV4AvIp lCgVL9OAkQ0JEQGGu30uBR4UK5eZFrNPx53Sh+AMQYJDYPsMVaB+82lcc1BZ+m2cQ2H9 4hjEclHOFFhFfTpRvJmiCIBzF2K4EGK4pKxQ53HpZggIMv/IQb6XiQx5iV9noijsQXO1 0NR/KvhYu+VS8gvaVBag7a21xNHO6yyUmY7Znvf7cmFEhxvV+yvkGjtcVmNzaF1LeZB3 wbVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UIFg+atB098Vw5O0riWbpK0bQpGBq9ZeXkTZStw6yHc=; b=cBLkppoxr3frSa4EslOc+IemdhPkQprel6fw1vOsuT1yz80x3x05AlYFFcIUa9Faav nufTn9ZzOyRQRAE1pNp9pmg+dfk3drAMIhcqBpn8ofdlFVFAdSvU55LwogCVdMqDXyJV hz7QZxe7gQa8tbFdvtDqO4GRAZisRcmvmhLVYA9ANknGctqDsy4cgGcEo75wpCWqi7oz 8yeXBPaTQ2RhwZIRxI4lHgmJOeN/RlJA/gLzyEexA/Yhwwq1tKypKBo1nE/pShESrfTL q+8m2LoZCHogzo4jxHoivjnVZf9+2JMJed9fbiYVHyzCAdr849VwrF3DPBs6GVzVvKie 72vA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03QMPfE0/bxU5dOzaum0kq4hwLphMwKoAas6ZRwptkmqdW4lVMzK9yrMzVjlFVXjw==
X-Received: by 10.28.197.6 with SMTP id v6mr16469560wmf.130.1479758729312; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.131] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm26788257wjx.44.2016.11.21.12.05.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Topic IPv6
To: shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx
References: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com> <20161121135800.hj773gvjquay7ka5@nic.fr> <bb9385fd-42f5-cab5-580d-06d7bcac117d@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611211437090.13578@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d3adc96d-f549-9c3f-d326-9d128ddc2c8f@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:05:27 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611211437090.13578@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uBmE-iYbuwaZ5znfqaI5RqnCql8>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:05:33 -0000


On 21/11/2016 19:38, shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 21/11/2016 13:58, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>>> Usual argument from the police ("if you want privacy, it means you are
>>> a criminal trying to hide something"). You will have a hard time
>>> convincing people to buy it.
>>
>> Whilst true, you also  need to respect the notion that the job of the 
>> police is to protect
>> us from the malevolence of some very evil people.
>
> In theory, fine.  In practice, you have situations where the police 
> are in place to protect the corporate revenue of very evil people by 
> brutalizing the innocent.  See Dakota Access Pipeline for an example.
>

If the police are being excessive, then due process needs to be brought 
to bare on the police, and that is something that the population needs 
to do though its legal process. However I remain with the point that 
many innocent and vulnerable people would become victims in the absence 
of an effective police force, and that the role of the police is to 
protect such people.

Stewart



>>
>> - Stewart
>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email