IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Topic IPv6

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Sun, 20 November 2016 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1132f40f5d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C43129576 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:25:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kF_MQ1oJ3Kii for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:25:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9CD129504 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:25:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1479673508; x=1480278308; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=71o304/Y+8wCppzTpnsT2Gn3i bowM+KSoCLBKIIAbYQ=; b=CLBjH6FqllpCw48w8NnDeg2zc8GarNbfIkRt3ovuk 32IhJIkB9CY4R3LW2Aq2SBiNys9HYT3rCHq7p4L1/D89PP4ZeYWho7Ggvk6UOKxa PwBtWk0flkCZ5+hU6/EP/7HjTDyQ0fH24IEzi0Qd9Y0xCxCpjolN+yUsfz1rwM7w eI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=WHwYqhT9l1qj2GY19h3E+CZBeBj5wGLC3StYKDazFBPmGcKvPCYN+DjOlR/a FbW7HZdNWjqjJ2mJGmckZAM9DV7aEv3ub2S+xQRc97GMHMiXYMfod/xox ZAGkGT8Paq4oi5j+ZWhHYQkRgkfHjv3zGHCTdlmZBziITgTDTWwKLo=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:25:08 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:25:07 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005233149.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:25:07 +0100
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:161120:md50005233149::OvMrS2s2dlXSFqFW:00005Lgr
X-Return-Path: prvs=1132f40f5d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1c.1.161117
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:25:06 +0100
Subject: Re: Topic IPv6
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <FEC56BCD-E12E-445D-B15B-B90524AE4176@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: Topic IPv6
References: <CAGxDXJ_7rbDyg-RDUswbnbS=8n+d4PM34=h6jCL6_gaT1zLOsA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGxDXJ_7rbDyg-RDUswbnbS=8n+d4PM34=h6jCL6_gaT1zLOsA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cJSfiDmdWaOuvVD6RMaAC6eNMTY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:25:14 -0000

Hi Alexander,

I’m understanding that this is related to IPv6 operations, or security? You may need to look at the v6ops or security WGs charters to understand which one fits better.

That way you will find the correct venue for such a discussion.

If the charters don’t fit, talk to WG chairs that you feel more convenient, in case something was missed in the charter and it may fit there.

Otherwise, you may need to call for a BOF.

In case you’re new to IETF, please make sure to read:

https://www.ietf.org/tao.html

https://www.ietf.org/newcomers.html

I will recommend to provide some details about your idea, so other people can help to identify if this work can be taken in an existing WG, etc.

But please read also RFC3005, as if the work has an alternative venue, the discussion should not continue in this list, or even to request the creation of a specific mailing list, etc.

Regards,
Jordi


-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
Responder a: <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
Fecha: domingo, 20 de noviembre de 2016, 20:52
Para: <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Topic IPv6

    
    Dear all,
    I would like to start new conversation and share some ideas about using advantages IPv6 to protect the Internet.
    
    Best regards, Alexander Nevalenniy.
    
    
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email