IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Topic IPv6

shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx Mon, 21 November 2016 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE21C1296ED for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:38:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUPW8hkaRLvR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:38:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sleekfreak.ath.cx (rrcs-67-79-182-226.se.biz.rr.com [67.79.182.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BA321296E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shogunx (helo=localhost) by sleekfreak.ath.cx with local-esmtp (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>) id 1c8uQP-0005UC-TK; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:38:45 -0500
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:38:45 -0500
From: shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topic IPv6
In-Reply-To: <bb9385fd-42f5-cab5-580d-06d7bcac117d@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611211437090.13578@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
References: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com> <20161121135800.hj773gvjquay7ka5@nic.fr> <bb9385fd-42f5-cab5-580d-06d7bcac117d@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gGk3acplwUAjl_fl6Xi_QUoCKsg>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:38:51 -0000


On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Stewart Bryant wrote:

>
>
> On 21/11/2016 13:58, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> Usual argument from the police ("if you want privacy, it means you are
>> a criminal trying to hide something"). You will have a hard time
>> convincing people to buy it.
>
> Whilst true, you also  need to respect the notion that the job of the police 
> is to protect
> us from the malevolence of some very evil people.

In theory, fine.  In practice, you have situations where the police are in 
place to protect the corporate revenue of very evil people by brutalizing 
the innocent.  See Dakota Access Pipeline for an example.

>
> - Stewart
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email