Re: "Management team"

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Dear Mr Daley,
At 05:57 PM 19-04-2020, Jay Daley wrote:
>Another way of looking at this is that the IESG have a set of 
>responsibilities (delegated authorities if you prefer) as does the 
>IETF Executive Director and as does the IRTF Chair, and if those get 
>together to coordinate on how they do their work and do not exceed 
>any of their responsibilities then why does that need a label or 
>formal recognition?  Or is it your view that a) the responsibilities 
>have been exceeded; or b) this type coordination across roles needs 
>community consensus approval before it is allowed to happen?  Your 
>note implies b) rather than a) which seems surprising so I suspect 
>I'm just missing a nuance.

There is a policy (BCP) about the meeting stuff.  It sets guidance 
for the IASA.  Are you are referring to that as the delegated 
authority?  There isn't anything in there about delegated authority 
for the IESG.  The IETF LLC gets to decide whether the IESG should be 
part of some management team.  A person operating at Management level 
is deemed to have understood the limits of his/her "authority".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy