IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Wed, 22 April 2020 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C8C3A0C49 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hk4TpNmER4m0; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jays-mbp.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 571C83A0C46; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <B447B1C6-B235-466B-963B-9C2CBDC241E6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_71C9C800-7D90-494B-A661-17B1C7627F34"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Session attendance reconciliation (was "Management team")
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:30:31 +1200
In-Reply-To: <69249B15FC435328F4D9BD4E@PSB>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <47A0EEE1BBB8EF41FD8B07E0@PSB> <26FF91F9-CD44-4045-991E-AF21A7208622@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20200421022015.0ba531d0@elandnews.com> <17E08229-CE52-434E-B2FF-22992E95DD30@ietf.org> <BD7D0BDB-C8EB-4113-B379-5B2095C7F9FA@episteme.net> <64A28988-B8DC-4DA3-90FF-FBE658AE620E@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20200422083137.0c226b08@elandnews.com> <a27cab38-8a1e-4088-fa1e-20c702b9b0c3@network-heretics.com> <01RK090BEE78000058@mauve.mrochek.com> <69249B15FC435328F4D9BD4E@PSB>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yiWAj67ksirDBC-qr1TLdi0Ps5U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:30:36 -0000

> On 23/04/2020, at 9:09 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> This suggests something else that may be relevant.  If there is
> _any_ chance that we might want to use session attendance
> information for IETF 107 for anything at all, including but
> definitely not limited to Nomcom eligibility in the future (not
> this year's NomCom), it would probably be wise to either merge
> to information from the Etherpad with Jabber logins and/or to
> explicit ask people who were unable (or sufficiently
> inconvenienced by technology) to record their presence on the
> Etherpad to identify themselves to the Secretariat in some
> appropriate way (I hope not on this mailing list).
> 
> Jay, is that feasible?

For IETF 107 the secretariat reconciled the list of Webex participants with the bluesheets to create a single list on a per session basis.  Inferring a participant’s name from a jabber ID is too hard.

Jay

> 
>    thanks,
>   john
> 
> 

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email