IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal Response to [removed] regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 03 July 2013 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5676D21F9C06 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zfv9zMxaCWMi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71DB21F99BB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=448; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1372882130; x=1374091730; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3AC0ZdeRvXJ2iRBy0lH4e+6yDZbDBloaJDbTjRmdwcE=; b=VXkP+j3OxadvX89NY5+I7A4jv1Ele0E+KYK4TM/f9OsIFD8rEIiK9ECP yV8SuptVlviJ6J/IEvtKDV3O+qs/RFprUhrJU8+9z/VqJ1gY4S8mpGw7K WzvCEi1r56T8mb390rZ0dIDYKXThVA48X4iEpKfUZRpXT3W6MV/3k7JrO g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjEFAMGD1FGQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABagwmEA70vgQgWdIIkAQEEI1UBEAsaAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBKxoGDQEHAQGIC6kQkQ6BJo5FB4JRgRwDl0mRRYMTOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,990,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="15282760"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2013 20:08:48 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.175.226]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r63K8k6e016537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Jul 2013 20:08:46 GMT
Message-ID: <51D484CE.1070806@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 22:08:46 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Appeal Response to [removed] regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
References: <20130702222442.2467.13086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408223F494ECC@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <m2mwq4o5pr.wl%randy@psg.com> <51D3FF7D.5050107@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130703083609.0dd81668@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130703083609.0dd81668@resistor.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>. John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:08:55 -0000

No hat on and I'm not commenting on the specific case at hand.

On the general point, I think it's better to err a bit toward the
generous side.  As an author I use as a rule of thumb whether or not I
or the working group has taken someone's suggestion and put it into
text.  And it has to be more than editorial.  A missing "," doesn't get
you into acknowlegments, but highlighting confusion or clarifying
language probably does.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email