RE: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Tue, 02 July 2013 23:39 UTC
Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7D511E80E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47PJEztbdCwK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A362811E80F2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [195.245.230.131:57896] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id B8/78-15398-1A463D15; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 23:39:13 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-78.messagelabs.com!1372808352!27123843!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.35]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.9; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 9623 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2013 23:39:13 -0000
Received: from exht021p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT021P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.35) by server-7.tower-78.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 2 Jul 2013 23:39:13 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.180]) by EXHT021P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.35]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 00:39:12 +0100
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: ietf@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:37:10 +0100
Subject: RE: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
Thread-Topic: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
Thread-Index: Ac53cxt+ShobSeljSVqU9lT9TWbFpQACfdAo
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408223F494ECC@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <20130702222442.2467.13086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130702222442.2467.13086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 23:39:20 -0000
Do we have any statistics on how many appeals to the IESG fail and how many succeed? If I knew that 97% of appeals get rejected, I wouldn't even bother writing one... (On the other hand, that might simply be because 97% of the appeals are written by loons. Statistics can't tell us everything.) Lloyd Wood http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ ________________________________________ From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG [iesg@ietf.org] Sent: 02 July 2013 23:24 To: abdussalambaryun@gmail.com Cc: ietf-announce@ietf.org Subject: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats The IESG has reviewed the appeal of Abdussalam Baryun dated June 19, 2013 on the subject of inclusion in the acknowledgments section of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/appeal/baryun-2013-06-19.txt This is a dispute about a matter in a working group. The same matter has previously been raised with the working group chairs and responsible Area Director, as specified in RFC 2026 Section 6.5.1. Writing acknowledgments sections is largely a matter of editorial discretion, where good sense and general attribution practices are the primary guidelines, although RFC 2026 Section 10.3.1 has some specific rules regarding acknowledgment of major contributors, copyright, and IPR. After reviewing the appeal, including the associated list discussion and draft revisions, the IESG concludes that the authors made a reasonable editorial choice that was well within their discretion and that none of the messages at issue fall under the required acknowledgment rules of RFC 2026 Section 10.3.1 and RFC 5378 Sections 5.6a and 1c. The IESG finds that the chairs and responsible AD handled complaints about the matter appropriately.
- RE: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… l.wood
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Bob Hinden
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Randy Bush
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Russ Housley
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Dave Crocker
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Jari Arkko
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… William McCall
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Pete Resnick
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Bary… Warren Kumari
- Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Bary… John C Klensin
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Dave Crocker
- Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Bary… Sam Hartman
- Re: Appeal Response to [removed] regarding draft-… SM
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Bary… Pete Resnick
- Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Bary… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Appeal Response to [removed] regarding draft-… Eliot Lear
- Re: Appeal Response to [removed] regarding draft-… Michael StJohns
- Re: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdu… Warren Kumari
- RE: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdu… l.wood
- Re: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdu… Doug Barton
- Re: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdu… Dave Cridland
- Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussal… Ted Lemon
- Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regardin… Jari Arkko