Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 04 July 2013 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FE621F9B95 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2SBwSs1J5vM6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og109.obsmtp.com (exprod7og109.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06C421F9B8D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob109.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUdTLQFfb6J6YCtUdR+9h6Pzllk5JczEm@postini.com; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:09:20 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7351B821E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653A5190061; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:09:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:09:20 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Subject: Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
Thread-Topic: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
Thread-Index: AQHOeFMcwvGtEEuk9kGtuofK1anurg==
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 01:09:19 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751FBD60@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <20130702222442.2467.13086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408223F494ECC@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <51D45225.1000804@qti.qualcomm.com> <1B046143-4B0E-41C0-9F50-09A87206FCE9@kumari.net> <FDE04DA5C72B9B80DCC2FE15@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <51D47C0C.3040603@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAMm+LwgpWZ6bP6Q4chfa-fOjQ3MBBfr0CW6SxzKFPnLe=cgpYA@mail.gmail.com>, <C03016D1-A784-4F4E-9A31-9824DE080F65@kumari.net> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408223F494EDA@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <51D4C2F4.3060003@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <51D4C2F4.3060003@dougbarton.us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <3CE359527892714CA089BDB8C9311CDE@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 01:09:27 -0000

On Jul 3, 2013, at 8:33 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:
> Wait, so now instead of voting we're using clubs? I think I need to pay more attention to this thread ...

If you don't read ietf, you don't get to participate in the consensus... ;)