IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 03 July 2013 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8327E11E8200 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYxWKHxWjIeM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF7E11E81F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947202013A; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:42:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SlZ-0v0EKo2A; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:42:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.0.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:42:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 83F4B81454; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:46:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: [IETF] Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
References: <20130702222442.2467.13086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408223F494ECC@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <51D45225.1000804@qti.qualcomm.com> <1B046143-4B0E-41C0-9F50-09A87206FCE9@kumari.net> <FDE04DA5C72B9B80DCC2FE15@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:46:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <FDE04DA5C72B9B80DCC2FE15@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> (John C. Klensin's message of "Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:10:47 -0400")
Message-ID: <tsly59nh470.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:47:14 -0000

>>>>> "John" == John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> writes:


Strong agreement.
I'm not currently a member of that club, although if I stick around the
IETF long enough it's bound to happen.
I've certainly received and reviewed appeals that I thought were a valid
contribution to the process.

Don't appeal if there is a better way to address your concerns, but if
an appeal is the right approach, then file one.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email