IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 03 July 2013 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D85621F9DEB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nPqKMsizEh5b for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA4221F9DDD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1372869160; x=1404405160; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k8SupP75KFS2RSafPwsuQvtqvoeVzOJBDnt/8qMfVRI=; b=KjpWhA2sgB5CPEWdkpf2slB3MwQ5xkX3eMxTSdF5YWEF0X4TzCZ9aEue bfe+F2kZ+sIb4KZh1xw3JOYimjhuXssla/NwKjtKFN6aRcdzRI/Va+oo/ WFVJqgN5Ifd22xt3hEI8+wx+6JNSI8helZVTOz0TEIR8+nNAFXsAUPWtb Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,989,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="46688950"
Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2013 09:32:40 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,988,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="474024525"
Received: from nasanexhc01.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.25]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 03 Jul 2013 09:32:40 -0700
Received: from nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) by NASANEXHC01.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:32:39 -0700
Received: from presnick-mac.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:32:39 -0700
Message-ID: <51D45225.1000804@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 11:32:37 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Appeal Response to Abdussalam Baryun regarding draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats
References: <20130702222442.2467.13086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408223F494ECC@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F12408223F494ECC@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:32:44 -0000

On 7/2/13 6:37 PM, l.wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
> Do we have any statistics on how many appeals to the IESG fail and how many succeed?
>    

My quick read of http://www.ietf.org/iesg/appeal.html:

Accepted: 6
Denied: 25
Withdrawn: 1

One appellant appealed 12 times and all of the appeals were denied. One 
appellant appealed 4 times, all denied. One appellant appealed 3 times, 
all denied.

At least two of the accepted appeals resulted in a different remedy than 
requested by the appellant (i.e., adding an IESG Note to a document 
instead of making other changes or rejecting the document).

At least two of the denied appeals were on strictly procedural grounds; 
one came over two months after the action, one was appealing an IAB 
decision that was out of jurisdiction for the IESG to decide.

Interpret the above as you see fit.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email