IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> Mon, 20 July 2009 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8742D3A6D2C for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.065
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.466, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsnSGa2yZrzk for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postlady.ripe.net (postlady.ripe.net [193.0.19.65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD093A6C20 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from herring.ripe.net ([193.0.1.203]) by postlady.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henk@ripe.net>) id 1MSnxh-0002hC-EH; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:11:11 +0200
Received: from geir-3.local (henk.vpn.ripe.net [193.0.21.33]) by herring.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6283A2F59D; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:11:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4A642699.4040300@ripe.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:11:05 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
References: <20090719112919.BCF4C1AABBDC@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20090719112919.BCF4C1AABBDC@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: ----
X-RIPE-Signature: e0cdef1f45f89a40ad608d255b27e7d5b1a1b7cb34fe6d4007b97d2803a7df46
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:12:13 -0000

Scott O. Bradner wrote:
>> Isn't this what has essentially happened in this case? 
> 
> I did not see a statement from the IETF asking for changes

Aren't RFC 5377/5378 (and subsequent discussion) such a statement?
(At least, that is where people told me to start when I asked why
we are doing this).

Henk



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Belgium: an unsolvable problem, discussed in endless meetings, with no
          hope for a solution, where everybody still lives happily.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email